Stefan Rusek wrote: > Sune, Yuki, and anyone else: > > What are your thoughts? So far the concensus seems to be leaning toward > using wstring directly instead of indirectly via #ifdef+typedefs.
Using the unicode API not just here, but in hg as well, is definately a wet dream. It's gonna be a while before that happens in hg, however. I think the shell extension should just use unicode API all the time, and handle coding back and forth between itself and Mercurial. As for the fixutf8 extension, last I checked it was pretty experimental and unstable... is it really in a state that we want to bundle with TortoiseHg at this time? /Sune ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
