On 15-11-2011 21:20, Marcel wrote: > Why not having different shortcuts on different systems? > > I, as Windows user, like CTRL+G.
Me too, but it does seem to be used for find next in the thg workbench after using CTRL+F to search in the patch text. Of course F3 works there as well... > On 15.11.2011 21:13, Steve Borho wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Sune Foldager<cyan...@me.com> wrote: >>> I changed the hotkey to CTRL+R which isn't used or reserved (and stands for >>> Revision), and fixed my user name. Are there any big problems with >>> expanding this to a QCompleter solution later on? I can work on that as >>> well, but I still think it's better than nothing like this. >> >> http://doc.qt.nokia.com/stable/qkeysequence.html >> >> CTRL+R is "refresh" on Linux. I recommend CTRL+SHIFT+G, FWIW Right, I agree with that, I think. Also somewhat more intuitive than CTRL+R even though it's an extra key. >> Adding the QCompleter as a second patch would be fine. Yeah, it's been like a million years since I did QT coding, so I'll have to ease into it ;) >>> We might pop up a message box for unknown revisions, that's another small >>> improvement. >> >> Would be nice. I'll try to put that in and resubmit. /Sune ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
