On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Steve Borho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 09:37 -0400, Douglas Philips wrote:
>  > On 2008 Apr 14, at 9:02 AM, TK Soh wrote:
>  > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Douglas Philips wrote:
>  > >>  Under my system (which isn't super, but isn't rusting edge
>  > >> either :),
>  > >>  it seems to take about 0.25 +/- 0.03 seconds to get an hg status (as
>  > >
>  > > Try the netbeans repo :-)
>  >
>  > Heh. Well, 0.25seconds compared to a CVS diff to server half-way
>  > round the world (literally)...
>  >
>  > > As long as users are aware of the impact and willing to pay the price,
>  > > I suppose we can have [yet] another flag for tortoisehg.overlayicons
>  > > to enable the display of overlay icons on repo roots.
>  > >
>  > > Let me see how much it will take.
>
>  One of the Google SOC project applications was to port inotify to
>  Windows.  If this were done, it would greatly speed up status queries
>  and many of these problems would melt away.

AFAIK, inotify only helps when you browse a repo the second time and
on. The first time a repo is checked, Mercurial still needs to walk
through the whole tree.

Of course, it'd always help :-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss

Reply via email to