On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07.08.2008 10:29, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: >> On 05.08.2008 17:02, Douglas Philips wrote: >>> On 2008 Aug 5, at 10:51 AM, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: >>> >>>> But you haven't presented any halfway convincing argument what's so >>>> bad about >>>> crew-stable tip, so that it can't be picked up by THG when >>>> THG is doing a new binary package of Mercurial to include Mercurial. >>> If it is so good to go, you have failed to provide a reason why >>> Mercurial hasn't released it. In fact, you haven't even provided a >>> reason why it isn't on the stable branch. >> >> FYI: In the mean time, Matt has pulled it into his stable branch: >> http://selenic.com/repo/index.cgi/hg-stable/rev/08d9e0f974d9 >> >> Current "official" stable (aka "Matt's stable repo") tip is: >> http://selenic.com/repo/index.cgi/hg-stable/rev/6d904eb19c2a >> (includes 08d9e0f974d9) >> >>> Why TortoiseHg should waste >>> its time vetting something that even Mercurial isn't ready to have >>> released. But you continue to expend energy criticizing instead of >>> making things better, so I'm out of this discussion, I need to spend >>> my energy testing 0.4rc4. Bye now. >> >> Quoting another post of Douglas: >> >> On 05.08.2008 16:08, Douglas Philips wrote: >> [snip] >>> TK has already made it clear that TortoiseHg will be built upon >>> released Mercurial, not on something that even the main Mercurial team >>> hasn't gone through the normal release processes on. As you noted >>> earlier in the thread, it was already mentioned that Mercurial wanted >>> to do a 1.0.2 that fixed this so that normal Mercurial release flows >>> would be able to pick this up. For some reason the will/interest/ >>> whatever to get that done has evaporated. >> >> It definitely hasn't "evaporated": >> See http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2008-August/007389.html >> >> [snipped rest of Doug's post] >> >> (Just as a reminder for those who haven't followed this whole thread: >> TortoiseHg 0.4 release candidate 4 contains the bug that was fixed in >> 08d9e0f974d9) > > For the record: 08d9e0f974d9 is now included in Mercurial 1.0.2 > http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-August/020753.html > > Side note: Matt made this release from the stable repo > (http://selenic.com/repo/hg-stable).
[cc the list this time] Matt also mentioned that there are some changes in the API, even if they are just minor ones. So I am going to release 0.4 with 1.0.1 (in a day or two). After that we will try to follow up with a quick 0.4.1 release to link to 1.0.2. Though an 0.4.1RC1 would seem like a safer approach. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
