On or about 2009 Feb 23, at 9:24 AM, Peter Arrenbrecht indited: > I'd love that too. ;) Seriously, it shouldn't be hard. Maybe > abstracting out the core graph viewer so it can handle pbranch's patch > graph would take some guidance. However, pbranch is still not even an > official Hg extension. And its non-standard tests currently make it a > bit hard to incorporate (it uses tests embedded in documentation with > little regard to platform portability). And mpm is not happy that we > currently seem to have 3-4 superficially similar extensions: mq, > pbranch, attic, and shelve.
Typical for open source, slightly different itches, slightly different scratches. It is a shame that we don't have a more centralized hunk "engine" (whatever that means) which could make creating even more of these 'scratches' easier, but at least they'd feel safer, being built on trustable core/engine technology... --Doug ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
