>> 2. Adopt named branches for releases, drop crew repository. > > why did you decide to go for named branches instead a seperate crew repo, > which seems to have been common practice up to now?
He said "mainly for dogfooding". To implement & improve "named branch" feature, we should be heavy user for that. but I might be confuse it a bit when moved to "named branch" development... regards, Yuki KODAMA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
