On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Laurent Dufrechou <laurent.dufrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ha thx for the recovery tool, perfect! > In fact for " no reason not to have both, which is the default config in a > new install." > We are using one repos for everyone (6 devs), so everybody can follow easily > the progress of the whole software. > I've forced people to always use repository viewer (and hidden commit one), > so they usually do: > - pull > - check how repository has evolved > - update on need > - commit in the good branch > - push if needed > > Before they had only commit available and we where branching a lot... :/ > > I'm starting to study the possibility to use named branch so every user will > have its branch + commit to it and from time to time resync with others. > The only showstopper for now is: > - repository view is always changing (means that people here would prefer > that the branch appears always in the same order) > (ex from left to right: default, Laurent, Seb etc...) > - I'm afraid of named branch because once it kind of definitive choice... > So I'm wondering if starting to use them will not make our repos like very > messy. > > Any suggestion on this? :)
Others can provide feedback on this, but if you do use named branches you can enable branch coloring and assign static colors for each branch. -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
