On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Michael Jay Lippert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Johan Samyn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 11-01-2011 21:15, Michael Jay Lippert wrote: >> >> A couple of UI issues in the thg beta that bug me :) > > <snip> >> >> 4) I'm not convince putting the mq patch name in the revision column of >> the >> log window works that well. The revision number is usually pretty short >> while the patch name is not. This means either size the column so you >> can't >> read the patch name, or size it much wider than is needed for the majority >> of the log entries and lose valuable horizontal real estate which could be >> better used for other columns (say the description column). >> >> Personally I think this is a non-issue. Cause the name of the patch is >> repeated at the start of the description, you can make the width of the rev >> column appropriate for the rev numbers. Unless of course you do not show the >> description column. > > Good point, I only had 1 test patch on the machine I'm testing thg and > overlooked that somehow. I retract issue #4 :-)
It probably still makes sense not to report a string in the rev column, because it will interfere with auto-resizing. -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
