Well I would like to see a real name as well, but I felt he made some good
points, actually expressing many of my thoughts about the 2.0 mq
functionality.
There are still several features that I use all the time which I find either
currently missing or more difficult to use in 2.0 which is why for now I'm
still using 1.10. That isn't to say that I don't expect that 2.0 will
eventually be better than the 1.0 tortoisehg, just that for right now I am
happier w/ 1.10.
I did just go to check out the latest stable build (I play with those on a
linux box) when I read your comment, and things do look much different than
the last release build I actually tried playing w/ patch queues.
So I'm looking forward to seeing how that version will fit my workflow when
it comes out and I think Neutrino should also, and then I'd like to hear
what he thinks of the changes.
Anyway, it seemed like a respectful, reasonably considered message to me.
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
