Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:06:15 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > For the width, it was changed by 363608abee0c to save space and there were > no complaints. I think it will be okay to make the width 1.2-1.5x wider > if many people love it. > > https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/thg/commits/363608abee0c
I'm generally peeking at the thg-dev list and I've seen when it has been introduced. I didn't like it initially, I still don't like it, but I didn't complain earlier as wanted to give it time to see if I wouldn't change my mind. Then I've given it a try and experimented hacking the source to bring the wider graph back, and I've been generally satisfied with the result. Still I see the relevant sources get refactored quite a bit lately, and I would love to see at least a configuration option (scaling factor which could be manually added, no need of a GUI) to control this presentational detail. -- Stanimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
