On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 1:39:53 PM UTC+2, Martin Widmer wrote:
> For many years now I am forced to use Tortoise for working with SVN server. 
> Everybody in my team is afraid of tree conflicts, since the support of 
> Tortoise for such conflicts is absolutely horrifying. You will never know 
> what actually happens and it is very frequent, that all your changes are lost.
> The dialogue window does not tell you what happened, it does not tell you 
> what is going to happen which you press this or that button. It is actually 
> one of the best examples I have ever soon of how you should NOT design and 
> label a usear dialogue box. The worst thing is that this has not improved 
> over years and generations of programmers are losing their changes because of 
> that. I am very disapponted with tortoise.

Leaving aside the tone, I'm confused. I assume you're referring to the new 
dialog in 1.10? Or have you not updated yet? Since you say "it has not improved 
over years", it sounds like you haven't.

In the case of 1.10, I actually find the new UI to be quite an improvement. SVN 
1.10 put some work into making interactive tree conflict handling more useful, 
and TortoiseSVN shows a proper dialog for that.

There are issues with the new dialog (cf. my recent thread about this), but I 
think it's a step in the right direction.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TortoiseSVN" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tortoisesvn/0bf0f44a-c5ec-4f99-aa8a-a996e6f1caf8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • Merge con... tortoisesvn+APn2wQdtYUcReCoc1knqOPpdSvBm9Zi9WWQHZgZBBt8Tg2ZVhj4w
    • Re: ... Stefan via TortoiseSVN
    • Re: ... tortoisesvn+APn2wQfyt_Cz0rUXr-YcGNAcA9aEfNHf5NYYM8Gqxp5_C9oZIHp-

Reply via email to