On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, adam - a...@xs4all.nl wrote: > hi, ><snip> > > So...moving forward - I welcome a review of potential tools for TOS and > we would certainly like to make TOS aware of Booki. If there will be a > formal process perhaps this should be outlined, otherwise I can email > something to the list (and I hope others do too with other suggestions). > > adam
Perhaps, adam, you could lead us to the requirements documents for booki and we could leverage that for our discussion here? Is there anyone here who works with The Linux Documentation Project and could point us to their requirements document, if any? Are there any other users of other documentation environments that could point us to similar requirements specifications for what they use? If there are no special requirements specifications on the projects for which you develop documentation, perhaps you can describe the work habits of the group for us? I'm interested in finding how well group dynamics are managed by the various existing documentation environments. I think Matthew Jadud had a valuable insight with his comments about a wiki approach. Parallel efforts that can be compared and contrasted, yet controlled until consensus is achieved is a key feature of cooperative development in my world view. _______________________________________________ tos mailing list tos@teachingopensource.org http://teachingopensource.org/mailman/listinfo/tos
