“This is something that is easier to do as a private company more easily than as a public company because the risk of being misunderstood by investors is less,”
How lame is that? If you want your destiny to depend on the ownership structure of your software vendor, which happens to be entirely outside your control, then closed source is for you. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Karl R. Wurst <karl.wu...@worcester.edu>wrote: > http://chronicle.com/blogs/**wiredcampus/in-victory-for-** > open-education-movement-**blackboard-embraces-sharing/**33776<http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/in-victory-for-open-education-movement-blackboard-embraces-sharing/33776> > > -- > > ______________________________**____________________ > Karl R. Wurst Ph.D., Professor and Chair > Computer Science, Worcester State University > 486 Chandler Street, Worcester, MA, USA 01602-2597 > Email: karl.wu...@worcester.edu > Web: > http://sharepoint.worcester.**edu/faculty/kwurst<http://sharepoint.worcester.edu/faculty/kwurst> > Phone: +1-508-929-8728 > Fax: +1-508-929-8156 > > ______________________________**_________________ > tos mailing list > tos@teachingopensource.org > http://lists.**teachingopensource.org/**mailman/listinfo/tos<http://lists.teachingopensource.org/mailman/listinfo/tos> >
_______________________________________________ tos mailing list tos@teachingopensource.org http://lists.teachingopensource.org/mailman/listinfo/tos
