↪ 2013-06-27 Thu 19:32, Ian McGowan <[email protected]>: > The Classes are a result of the sum of the scores of individual data points > from a service's ToS and privacy policy, so we couldn't just say "X clause > goes into Class C". What we can, and strive to do, is give the same score for > the same clause. So, ideally all arbitration clauses are 50 (or whatever), > etc. > > At this point, we don't have baseline scores for certain clauses, but by > curating multiple, similar clauses we arrive at one. Does that make sense? > For example, when I'm considering a score for a clause, I compare that clause > with clauses from other services we've already given scores to and use that > information to determine the score I should award. I think having a baseline > score would be a good idea, though. > > Hugo, do you care to weigh in on this?
For now I think it’s fine. Let’s go on, we’ll harmonise later ☺ -- Hugo Roy Project Lead, Terms of Service; Didn't Read <www.tosdr.org> Please use cryptography for email: see https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ Merci d’utiliser la cryptographie pour l’email : voir https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/fr/
pgpKGlgAjnSWy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
