Yeah, they should have written "only damages our reputation in reasonable ways" :)
Assigning bad:40 in the governance topic. On Friday, August 8, 2014 3:08:26 AM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > > From http://www.skype.com/en/legal/tou/ > > 5.13 Linking You may link to the Skype Website from another website owned > by you, provided you do so in a way that is fair and legal and does not > damage our reputation or take advantage of it. You must not establish a > link in such a way as to suggest any form of association, approval or > endorsement by Skype where none exists. You may not frame the Site on any > other site. Skype may revoke the permission to link to the Skype Websites > at any time at its sole discretion and will notify you in this respect. > > Note that since this message is posted on Google Groups, which is not my > own website, it's not a violation of their terms of service, even though > I'm posting the link above with the intention to damage Skype's reputation. > But bloggers beware: if you have a Skype account want to write about > Skype's ToS, you'd best not include a link. :) > > -- tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tosdr. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
