Shouldn't it be -40 because tracking/targeting is opt-out? Invading your
privacy should be opt-in to get a positive score.
At best opt-out should only reduce the negative score.
On Friday, 5 September 2014 14:14:36 UTC+1, Michiel de Jong wrote:
> Giving "personalized ads are opt-out" a [good] score of +40 in the 'track'
> On Friday, May 10, 2013 7:35:04 PM UTC+2, Robin Monks wrote:
> You have a variety of tools to
> control cookies and similar technologies, including:
> controls to block and delete cookies;
> Advertising controls, including Microsoft's controls at
> http://choice.live.com/advertisementchoice/, to opt out of receiving
> behaviorally targeted ads; and
> from some analytics providers to opt out of data collection in web
> From <http://www.microsoft.com/privacystatement/en-us/core/default.aspx>
[!!] Please see https://edit.tosdr.org -- this is where new contributions
should be submitted and discussed
tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tosdr.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.