Shouldn't it be -40 because tracking/targeting is opt-out? Invading your 
privacy should be opt-in to get a positive score.

At best opt-out should only reduce the negative score.

On Friday, 5 September 2014 14:14:36 UTC+1, Michiel de Jong  wrote:
> Giving "personalized ads are opt-out" a [good] score of +40 in the 'track' 
> topic
> On Friday, May 10, 2013 7:35:04 PM UTC+2, Robin Monks wrote:
> You have a variety of tools to
> control cookies and similar technologies, including:
>  Browser
>      controls to block and delete cookies;
>  Advertising controls, including Microsoft's controls at 
>, to opt out of receiving 
> behaviorally targeted ads; and
>  Controls
>      from some analytics providers to opt out of data collection in web
>      beacons.
> From <> 

[!!] Please see -- this is where new contributions 
should be submitted and discussed | |
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to