Shouldn't it be -40 because tracking/targeting is opt-out? Invading your privacy should be opt-in to get a positive score.
At best opt-out should only reduce the negative score. On Friday, 5 September 2014 14:14:36 UTC+1, Michiel de Jong wrote: > Giving "personalized ads are opt-out" a [good] score of +40 in the 'track' > topic > > On Friday, May 10, 2013 7:35:04 PM UTC+2, Robin Monks wrote: > You have a variety of tools to > control cookies and similar technologies, including: > > > Browser > controls to block and delete cookies; > Advertising controls, including Microsoft's controls at > http://choice.live.com/advertisementchoice/, to opt out of receiving > behaviorally targeted ads; and > Controls > from some analytics providers to opt out of data collection in web > beacons. > > > > > > > From <http://www.microsoft.com/privacystatement/en-us/core/default.aspx> -- [!!] Please see https://edit.tosdr.org -- this is where new contributions should be submitted and discussed tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tosdr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tosdr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tosdr/50a4cca6-5ead-4efc-97be-43b63732b202%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.