_____ From: Subject: FW: Goldman Sachs (JEWS) BRIBED SENATE to OK Bailout
Talk about Crooks...Here is a perfect example of how our Senators are corrupted....and they like it so... Goldman Sachs Bribed Senate to Pass Bailout http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek7zc0lJxbM How much bribe money does it take to transfer $700 Billion taxpayer dollars to Wall Street's elite? GOLDMAN SACHS CONTRIBUTIONS: Obama, Barack (D-IL) $691,930 Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) $468,200 Romney, Mitt (R) $229,675 McCain, John (R-AZ) $208,395 Himes, Jim (D-CT) $114,748 Giuliani, Rudolph W (R) $111,750 Dodd, Christopher J (D-CT) $105,400 Edwards, John (D) $66,450 Specter, Arlen (R-PA) $47,600 Emanuel, Rahm (D-IL) $32,950 Reed, Jack (D-RI) $30,100 How much money did your Representative get from Big Bankers to look the other way and pass a bill that the American people clearly do not want? Complete CONTRIBUTION LIST: http://www.washingtonyourefired.com/goldman_sachs_2008_contributions.html <http://www.washingtonyourefired.com/goldman_sachs_2008_contributions.html> <http://www.washingtonyourefired.com/goldman_sachs_2008_contributions.html> HELP SPREAD THE WORD... http://www.WashingtonYoureFired.com <http://www.washingtonyourefired.com/> Credit Crisis Government Manipulation- Shocking Answers http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6597.html Three Questions The Government Doesn't Want You To Ask About the Financial Crisis And 3 Shocking Answers! (...) Here are 3 questions excerpted from the free report: 1. Didn't Congress create the Federal Housing Authority, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Banks for the purpose of helping the public buy homes?You're kidding, right? What happened is that clever businessmen schemed with members of Congress to create privileged lending institutions so they could get rich off the public's labor. In return, members of Congress got big campaign contributions from the privileged corporations and, as a bonus, even more votes. The public's welfare had nothing to do with it. (...) 2. Who cares if a bank goes under? Won't the FDIC protect depositors?The FDIC is not funded well enough to bail out even a handful of the biggest banks in America. It has enough money to pay depositors of about three big banks. After that, it's broke. But here is the real irony: The FDIC, as history will ultimately demonstrate, causes banks to fail. The FDIC creates destruction three ways. First, its very existence encourages banks to take lending risks that they would never otherwise contemplate, while it simultaneously removes depositors' incentives to keep their bankers prudent. This double influence produces an unsound banking system. We have reached that point today. CLIP Mark Mitchell, Deep Capture: The Naked Short Selling That Toppled Wall Street (October 2nd, 2008) THIS (rather technical) ARTICLE EXPLAINS HOW THE CABAL MANUFACTURED THIS CRISIS - Must read! http://www.deepcapture.com/the-naked-short-selling-that-toppled-wall-street/ <http://www.deepcapture.com/the-naked-short-selling-that-toppled-wall-street /> <http://www.deepcapture.com/the-naked-short-selling-that-toppled-wall-street /> The Wall Street Journal stated in a lead editorial last week that the SEC was "reasonable" to "clamp down" on naked short selling. Well, that was progress of sorts, though one wonders how it could have taken all these years for the nation's most important newspaper to suggest that it might be "reasonable" to put an end to criminal activity that has eviscerated hundreds of companies and destroyed countless lives. And now that this criminal activity has been implicated in the Humpty Dumptying of our financial system, one grows wistful for the golden age of journalism when editorialists (people working for famous newspapers, not just cyber weirdos) would express a little outrage, demand that heads roll - muster something better than "reasonable" to describe the limpid "clamp down" of an SEC that bows in oily servitude to the very short-sellers who manhandled our markets. Alas, The Wall Street Journal is not angry about the scandal of naked short selling. To the contrary, it devotes most of its editorial to tut-tutting the SEC for taking the mild step of requiring hedge funds to disclose their short positions. This, the Journal laments, means the government wants to "slap a scarlet letter on short sellers." And (shed a tear) hedge funds will now have to "worry that their strategies will be put on display for the world to see."Might the world like to see which hedge funds are employing the strategy of illegal naked short selling - offloading huge chunks of stock that they do not possess - phantom stock - in order to drive down prices? No, nothing to see there, says the Journal. Having thoroughly investigated the matter, the editorialist reports that there is "no evidence of widespread naked shorting of financial stocks in this panic." Indeed, the Journal assures us that there is no evidence that short sellers have engaged in any market manipulation whatsoever. That is a mighty bold claim. As the Wall Street Journal itself reported, the SEC has ordered two dozen hedge funds to turn over trading records as part of its investigation into possible short-seller manipulation of six big financial institutions - American International Group, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Washington Mutual, and Merrill Lynch.The SEC has never in history prosecuted a major case against a short seller, and there is no reason to believe that it is actually going to nail someone now. But it is not difficult to see why the SEC feels that is has no choice but to investigate.It must investigate, or at least appear to investigate, because the data scream, "Investigate!"Take the case of Washington Mutual, which met its demise on the same day that the Journal published its editorial. While the SEC has not yet released data covering the last couple weeks of turmoil, the data through June show that at one point that month "failures to deliver" of Washington Mutual's stock reached an astounding 9 million shares. >From June 5 to June 19 there were, on any given day, at least 1 million WaMu shares that had "failed to deliver." In other words, hedge funds and brokers sold as many as 9 million shares that they did not possess (which is why they "failed to deliver" them), and they kept the market saturated with at least 1 million phantom shares for more than two weeks. WaMu's stock price dropped by more than 30% during this period. Similar attacks, with similar effects, occurred one after another in the months leading up to June.That is very good evidence of illegal market manipulation. Aside from Washington Mutual, Bank of America, Fannie Mae, MBIA, Ambac, and close to 50 smaller financial firms - not to mention a couple hundred non-financial companies - have appeared on the SEC-mandated "threshold" list of companies whose stock has "failed to deliver" in excessive quantities. That, too, is very good evidence of illegal market manipulation. A number of the big banks never appeared on the SEC's "threshold" list. Perhaps that explains the Journal's claim that there is "no evidence" that naked short selling contributed to our financial crisis. If so, the Journal does not understand the methods that naked short sellers use to manipulate the markets. The Journal also does not understand how powerful financial elites manipulate the government (and the media). <CLIP> ------ End of Forwarded Message *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr <http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2> http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 for more real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 or http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_63/165000/165077/21/print/165077.pdf <http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames> http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames http://blogs.albawaba.com/Alexanderjames/page/links http://bb.domaindlx.com/alexjames999 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan, pro-truth-honesty-peace, and anti-war-lies-crime. The purpose is to expose corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies, criminal plans, cover-ups and free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments, foundations, corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism, economy, business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to trick the public into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and freedoms, while the propaganda we are subjected to makes us believe that we have evolved to where such things cannot happen [remember slavery, apartheid.]. Please share what you learn with others who do not have access to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that is used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory aggressions;spread the truth;free your mind from being a Zioncon occupied territory of the neo-feudal lords by rejecting the mainstream news propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of schizophrenia because it provides a true vision of reality which is so different from the one we are presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened.com, inforwars.com, whtt.org, savethemales.ca & other alternative news sites for latest news flashes. In Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or others mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to stimulate dialogue and discussion. NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" To receive email at another address, please reply with subject line "CHANGE" To receive email, please reply with "WEEKLY" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
