_____ From: Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:59 AM Subject: PP: Memo to NIST-- WTC 7-Size Building Burns in China; Does Not Collapse
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-do es-not-collapse.html> Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST's "new phenomenon" explain this one? Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top1a <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top1a.j pg> Paul Joseph Watson <http://prisonplanet.com/> Prison Planet.com Monday, February 9, 2009 A fierce fire consumed all 44 floors of a skyscraper in Beijing today, shooting 30 foot flames into the air, but unlike the similarly-sized 47-story WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just eight floors, the building in China did not collapse. "The fire was burning from the ground floor to the top floor of the large building, the flames reflecting in the glass facade of the main CCTV tower next to the hotel and cultural center," <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/world/asia/10beijing.html?hp> reports the New York Times. "The 241-room Mandarin Oriental hotel in the building was due to open this year. Flames were spotted around 7:45 p.m. and within 20 minutes the fire had spread throughout the building, dominating that part of the city." "Hundreds of firefighting vehicles and police blocked off all approaches to the building - which was also set to house a luxury hotel due to be opened in 2009 - with flames appearing to leap 20 to 30 feet into the air," <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5694686.ece> adds The London Times. Compare images of WTC 7 with those of the skyscraper fire in Beijing. Note that the Beijing skyscraper appears to be leaning due to the unorthodox design of the building - it did not suffer any kind of collapse. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top2 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top2.jp g> Beijing skyscraper. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top3 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top3.jp g> WTC 7 Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top4 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top4.jp g> Beijing skyscraper. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top5 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top5.jp g> WTC 7 Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top7 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top7.jp g> Beijing skyscraper. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top6 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top6.jp g> WTC 7 To any sane and rational observer, which of these buildings would have been the most likely to collapse? And yet it was WTC 7 which collapsed within 7 seconds into its own footprint on 9/11. The Beijing skyscraper, though gutted by fire damage, remains standing. How do the debunkers explain away this one? How come <http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-wtc-7-report-shameful-embarrassing-and-com pletely-flawed.html> NIST's newly invented "phenomenon" of "thermal expansion" didn't put paid to the skyscraper in Beijing? Does fire have different properties in China compared to the U.S.? Does it behave in different ways depending on what country it's in? Remember that WTC 7 was <http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2007/010307BBC_WTC7.htm> structurally reinforced and suffered limited fires across just 8 floors. The core of NIST's explanation, that an "extraordinary event" called "thermal expansion" was to blame for the sudden total collapse of WTC 7 is of course on the face of it a fraud <http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html> when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors. The Beijing skyscraper fire provides yet more comparable evidence to illustrate the monolithic hoax that fire damage alone can cause buildings to collapse implosion style, adding more weight to the argument that both WTC 7 and the twin towers were <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n593Hth8h9M> destroyed by explosives that were seen and heard by dozens of eyewitnesses who were at ground zero. Take another example - <http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/windsor.html> the Windsor building in Madrid, a 32 story skyscraper which was a raging inferno for no less than 24 hours before fire crews were able to put out the flames. Despite the building being constructed of columns a fraction as thick as those used in the WTC twin towers, as well as a total lack of fireproofing, the building's top section only partially collapsed while the integrity of the whole structure remained firmly intact. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top8 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top8.jp g> Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top9 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top9.jp g> Compare these images of the Windsor building fire to those of WTC 7 and the twin towers. Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top10 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top10.j pg> Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse 090209top11 <http://freespeech.vo.llnwd.net/o25/pub/pp/images/february2009/090209top11.j pg> The skyscraper fire in Beijing offers another stark and bold reminder that when one eliminates the dodgy, agenda-driven, and incomprehensible delusions of NIST, one fact remains abundantly clear; Office fires - even the flame shooting towering inferno variety - cannot cause modern buildings to implode in on themselves and collapse. Only deliberately placed explosives can achieve this end. The Windsor fire, the Beijing skyscraper fire and many more yet to come painfully underscore the awful truth that the only way WTC 7 and the twin towers could have collapsed in the manner that they did was by means of controlled demolition and/or possibly some other manmade device. Research related articles: 1. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-nist-docs-%e2%80%9cunusual%e2%80%9d-even t-before-collapse-of-wtc-7.html> Leaked NIST Docs: "Unusual" Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7 2. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/unusual-magnetic-forces-should-not-have-caused- the-twin-towers-to-collapse.html> "Unusual Magnetic Forces" Should Not Have Caused the Twin Towers to Collapse 3. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/shyam-sunders-sham-nists-final-report-on-the-co llapse-of-building-7.html> Shyam Sunder's Sham: NIST's Final Report on the Collapse of Building 7 4. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/no-bbc-wtc-7-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-the-f inal-911-mystery-is-not-solved.html> No BBC, WTC 7 Did Not Collapse "Due To Fire" & The Final 9/11 Mystery Is Not Solved 5. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientists-unusual-magnetic-forces-caused-twin- towers-collapse.html> Scientists: "Unusual Magnetic Forces" Caused Twin Towers Collapse 6. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/wtc-7-emergency-head-was-building-collapse-spec ialist.html> WTC 7 Emergency Head Was Building Collapse Specialist 7. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-phantom-usa-today-building-fire-and-the-eva cuation-of-arlingtons-twin-towers-on-911.html> The Phantom USA Today Building Fire and the Evacuation of Arlington's 'Twin Towers' on 9/11 8. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-failure-of-the-nist-wtc-7-report-to-address -concerns-raised-in-appendix-c-of-the-2002-fema-building-performance-study.h tml> The failure of the NIST WTC 7 report to address concerns raised in Appendix C of the 2002 FEMA Building Performance Study 9. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-then-a-miracle-occurs.html> NIST: "Then a Miracle Occurs" 10. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html > BBC Article: "9/11 Third Tower Mystery 'Solved'" 11. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-concludes-fire-caused-wtc-7-%e2%80%9ccolla pse%e2%80%9d-when-fema-report-concluded-fuel-tank-explosion-had-low-probabil ity%e2%80%9d-of-knocking-down-tower.html> NIST Concludes "Fire" Caused WTC 7 "Collapse" when FEMA Report Concluded Fuel Tank Explosion had "low probability" of Knocking Down Tower 12. <http://www.prisonplanet.com/nists-wtc7-collapse-models-some-observations.ht ml> NIST's WTC7 collapse models: some observations *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr <http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2> http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 for more real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 or http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_63/165000/165077/21/print/165077.pdf <http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames> http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames http://blogs.albawaba.com/Alexanderjames/page/links http://bb.domaindlx.com/alexjames999 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan, pro-truth-honesty-peace, and anti-war-lies-crime. The purpose is to expose corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies, criminal plans, cover-ups and free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments, foundations, corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism, economy, business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to trick the public into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and freedoms, while the propaganda we are subjected to makes us believe that we have evolved to where such things cannot happen [remember slavery, apartheid.]. Please share what you learn with others who do not have access to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that is used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory aggressions;spread the truth;free your mind from being a Zioncon occupied territory of the neo-feudal lords by rejecting the mainstream news propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of schizophrenia because it provides a true vision of reality which is so different from the one we are presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened.com, inforwars.com, whtt.org, savethemales.ca & other alternative news sites for latest news flashes. In Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or others mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to stimulate dialogue and discussion. NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" To receive email at another address, please reply with subject line "CHANGE" To receive email, please reply with "WEEKLY" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
