_____  

From: 
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: Behind the violence in Gujarat, Gaza and Iraq is the banality of
democracy

 

Quote: "As the Israeli right looks likely to be the latest electoral
beneficiary of state terror, it is time to ask: can the institutions of
electoral democracy, liberal capitalism and the nation-state be relied upon
to do our moral thinking for us? "Trust in the majority," they seem to say,
but more often than not the majority proves itself incapable of even common
sense." "The moral deviancy of our elite no longer shocks. What is
dispiriting is its tacit endorsement by electoral majorities..Many Indians
and Israelis seem set to elect, with untroubled consciences, those who speak
the language of torturers and terrorists. More disturbingly, these corrupted
democracies may increasingly prove the norm rather than the exception" -
Pankaj Mishra

 

 

 

cid:811C0D45BE3240868015448E04511326@Raja

Behind the violence in Gujarat, Gaza and Iraq is the banality of democracy

 

 

The moral deviancy of our elite no longer shocks. What is dispiriting is its
tacit endorsement by electoral majorities

 

Pankaj Mishra

The Guardian, Wednesday 11 February 2009

 

. Pankaj Mishra is author of Temptations of the West: How to Be Modern in
India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Tibet

 

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

 

 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/11/pankaj-mishra-democracy
>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/11/pankaj-mishra-democracy

 

In his memoir, Secrets, Daniel Ellsberg describes how he decided to risk
years in prison by leaking the Pentagon Papers, the top-secret record of
American decision-making on Vietnam, to the New York Times. Hoping that his
wife, Patricia, would help him make up his mind, Ellsberg showed her a few
memos on bombing strategies crafted by his former superiors at the Pentagon.
She was horrified by some of the phrases in the documents: "a need to reach
the threshold of pain"; "salami-slice bombing campaign"; "the objective of
persuading the enemy"; "ratchet"; "one more turn of the screw". "This is the
language of torturers," she told Ellsberg. "These have to be exposed."

 

I recalled this scene while reading about Israel's objectives in its assault
on Gaza, as defined by the country's political and military leaders and its
western supporters. Speaking to a delegation from the Israeli lobby Aipac,
President Shimon Peres confirmed that "Israel's aim was to provide a strong
blow to the people of Gaza so that they would lose their appetite for
shooting at Israel". Writing in the New York Times, Thomas Friedman, who had
previously explained that the US invasion of Iraq was meant to say "suck on
this" to the Muslim world, agreed that "the only long-term source of
deterrence is to exact enough pain on the civilians".

 

Perhaps it is no longer shocking that elected leaders and mainstream
journalists in democracies seem to borrow their tone and vocabulary from
Ayman al-Zawahiri - after all, the war on terror, now officially declared a
"mistake", unhinged some of our best writers and thinkers. What is more
bewildering and dispiriting than the moral deviancy of our political elites
is its tacit endorsement by large democratic majorities.

 

Democracy, loudly upheld as a cure for much of the ailing world, has proved
no guarantor of political wisdom, even if it remains the least bad form of
government. In 2006 the Palestinians voted for Hamas, whose doctrinal
commitment to the destruction of Israel makes peace in the Middle East even
less likely. Given the chance, majorities in many Muslim countries would
elect similarly intransigent Islamist parties to high office.

 

But majority opinion in older and presumably more mature democracies often
doesn't seem much more sensible: the violence approved by it makes much of
the devastation caused by terrorists and dictators seem minor by comparison.
Initially, at least, Americans overwhelmingly supported George Bush's
catastrophic forays in the Middle East. Operation Cast Lead was blessed by a
remarkably high proportion of Israelis, who since 1977 have freely elected a
series of leaders - Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, Ariel Sharon - tainted
by involvement in terrorist groups and war crimes, and appear ready to
extend their imprimatur to the obstreperously racist Avigdor Lieberman.

 

When last week in Ha'aretz the Israeli historian Tom Segev judged Israeli
"apathy" towards the massacre in Gaza as "chilling and shameful", he brought
on deja vu among Indians. In 2002 the Hindu nationalist government of
Gujarat supervised the killing of more than two thousand Muslims. The
state's chief minister, Narendra Modi, who green-lighted the mass murder,
seemed a monstrous figure to many Indians; they then watched aghast as the
citizens of Gujarat - better-educated and more prosperous than most Indians
- re-elected Modi by a landslide after the pogrom. In 2007, a few months
after the magazine Tehelka taped Hindu nationalists in Gujarat boasting how
they raped and dismembered Muslims, Modi again won elections with
contemptuous ease. Though prohibited from entering the US, Modi is now
courted by corporate groups, including Tata, and frequently hailed as
India's next prime minister.

 

As the Israeli right looks likely to be the latest electoral beneficiary of
state terror, it is time to ask: can the institutions of electoral
democracy, liberal capitalism and the nation-state be relied upon to do our
moral thinking for us? "Trust in the majority," they seem to say, but more
often than not the majority proves itself incapable of even common sense.

 

It is true that thoughtlessness and apathy rather than malicious intent on
the part of majorities helps their representatives to perpetrate or cover up
such atrocities as Gujarat, the blockade of Gaza, or the occupation of
Kashmir - forms of violence less obvious or written about than 9/11, Saddam
Hussein's regime, and the recent terrorist attacks on Mumbai. But this
doesn't make thoughtlessness and apathy less destructive in actuality than
the malevolence of despots and terrorists.

 

Hannah Arendt's phrase "banality of evil" refers precisely to how a
generalised moral numbness among educated, even cultured, people makes them
commit or passively condone acts of extreme violence. Arendt marvelled at
"the phenomenon of evil deeds, committed on a gigantic scale, which could
not be traced to any particularity of wickedness, pathology or ideological
conviction in the doer, whose only personal distinction was a perhaps
extraordinary shallowness".

 

Shallowness and ignorance have been our lot in the mass consumer societies
we inhabit, where we were too distracted to act politically, apart from
periodically deputing political elites to take life-and-death decisions on
our behalf. We were shielded from many of the deleterious consequences,
which worked themselves out on obscure people in remote lands. The free
world's economic implosion is bringing home the intolerable cost of this
collective deference to apparently efficient elites and anonymous,
overcomplex institutions.

 

It is too easy to blame Bush, who told Americans to go spend and consume
while he ratcheted up pain levels in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the
grotesquely overrated technocrats running banks and businesses. As the New
York Times columnist Frank Rich reminded Americans last week: "We spent a
decade feasting on easy money, don't-pay-as-you-go consumerism and a
metastasizing celebrity culture. We did so while a supposedly cost-free,
off-the-books war, usually out of sight and out of mind, helped break the
bank along with our nation's spirit and reputation."

 

The prosperity many democracies enjoyed lulled citizens into political
torpor. The prospect of economic collapse has persuaded a majority of
Americans to exercise more individual judgment than they showed while
re-electing Bush in 2004. But collective failures of the kind Barack Obama
spoke of in his stern inaugural speech will continue to occur among citizens
of other democracies - and they will have no Obama to exhort them to
personal responsibility.

 

In any case, economic disasters or foolish wars are hardly guaranteed to
bring about large-scale individual self-examination or renew the appeal of
truly participatory democracy. They are more likely to make authoritarianism
attractive, as European democracies in the 1930s and Russia in recent times
demonstrated. Many Indians and Israelis seem set to elect, with untroubled
consciences, those who speak the language of torturers and terrorists. More
disturbingly, these corrupted democracies may increasingly prove the norm
rather than the exception.

 

. Pankaj Mishra is author of Temptations of the West: How to Be Modern in
India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Tibet

 

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR ***

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links
may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser.

Please check  <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  for more
real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email
all posts)

free book download:   <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077>
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 or
http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_63/165000/165077/21/print/165077.pdf  

 <http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames>
http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames
http://blogs.albawaba.com/Alexanderjames/page/links
http://bb.domaindlx.com/alexjames999  

*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes
only. *** Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan,
pro-truth-honesty-peace, and anti-war-lies-crime. The purpose is to expose
corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies, criminal plans, cover-ups and
free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments, foundations,
corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human
rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism,
economy, business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to
trick the public into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and
freedoms, while the propaganda we are subjected to makes us believe that we
have evolved to where such things cannot happen [remember slavery,
apartheid.]. Please share what you learn with others who do not have access
to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that is
used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory
aggressions;spread the truth;free your mind from being a Zioncon occupied
territory of the neo-feudal lords by rejecting the mainstream news
propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of schizophrenia because it
provides a true vision of reality which is so different from the one we are
presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at
alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened.com, inforwars.com, whtt.org,
savethemales.ca  & other alternative news sites for latest news flashes. In
Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions and
viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or
others mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to
stimulate dialogue and discussion.

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency
(NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse,
nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail
is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the
Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer
Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire &
are all intended for entertainment and amusement only.

To be removed from the list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

To receive email at another address, please reply with subject line "CHANGE"

To receive email, please reply  with "WEEKLY"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

This email has been scanned by Google email security


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to