_____  

*The Tel Aviv-based Dan David Foundation has just awarded Blair with one 
million dollars, an award for his “leadership on the world stage”. Indeed, not 
many world leaders were as committed to killing so many innocent civilians in 
the name of democracy. Not many world leaders agreed to recruit their armies 
for fighting Israeli wars.
  _____  

Gilad Atzmon <http://www.gilad.co.uk/>  is an Israeli-born musician, writer and 
anti-racism campaigner. A version of this article appeared in Palestine Think 
Tank <http://palestinethinktank.com/> .

 

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]

Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 2:13 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [Alert] Deconstructing Islamophobe Nick Cohen

 

New on REDRESS INFORMATION & ANALYSIS website:

 

ARTICLE  - "Deconstructing Nick Cohen."

 

LOCATION (URL) -

http://www.redress.cc/stooges/gatzmon20090308 

 

SYNOPSIS - Gilad Atzmon analyses Observer columnist war-mongering Islamophobe

Nick Cohen’s extraordinary claim that “anti-Semitism” within the British

left had turned him into a raving Zionist.

 

FOR THE FULL STORY, GO TO:

http://www.redress.cc/stooges/gatzmon20090308

 

--

 

  _____  


Deconstructing Nick Cohen


By Gilad <http://www.redress.cc/stooges/gatzmon20090308#gatzmon20090308_bio>  
Atzmon

8 March 2009

Gilad Atzmon analyses Observer columnist and war-mongering Islamophobe Nick 
Cohen’s extraordinary claim that “anti-Semitism” within the British left had 
turned him into a raving Zionist. 

In an article published by the Jewish Chronicle, Observer columnist Nick Cohen 
argued that hatred has turned him into a 
<http://www.thejc.com/articles/hatred-turning-me-a-jew>  Jew. Initially, I was 
rather amused by this revealing confession. Cohen must have a lot of hatred in 
him. He was one of the very few supporters within the British media of the 
illegal war against Iraq. He really believed that liberating the Iraqis was the 
way forward. Incidentally, he also possesses an incredible record of 
Islamophobic 
<http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/display/Search?searchQuery=nick+cohen&moduleId=1290238&moduleFilter=&categoryFilter=&startAt=0>
  ranting. Hence, at first I tended to interpret Cohen’s declaration as an 
acknowledgment that it was the loathing towards others which he finds in 
himself that made him into a Jew. 
 
I was obviously wrong. Cohen was quick to clarify that it is actually other 
people’s hatred, specifically that of the British “left” that “indulges 
anti-Semitism”, which made him “feel kosher”. 
 
As we have observed many times before, it is always someone or something else 
that transforms the “innocent”, “atheist”, “cosmopolitan”, “secularist”, 
“egalitarian” person into a “Jew”. I have previously heard Jewish leftists 
argue that it was Hitler who made them into Jews; now we have Nick Cohen of the 
Observer who claims that it is actually the “left” that makes him “feel 
kosher”. If it wasn’t very funny, it would have been very sad, maybe even 
tragic. 
 
One again, I find myself acknowledging that the more I elaborate on issues 
concerning contemporary Jewish identity, the more I realize that it is actually 
the so-called “secular”, “enlightened”, “emancipated”, “assimilated”, 
“cosmopolitan” Jew who provides us with a real meaningful insight into the 
subject of Zionism, Israeli genocidal policies, Jewish lobbying and Jewish 
institutional support of the Zionist crime.
 
Cohen’s Jewish Chronicle article is an exemplary case study of the Zionization 
of world Jewry and the transition of Jewish identity into a hawkish carrier of 
brutal, expansionist, murderous ideologies.


Let’s take it from the kosher horse’s mouth


“My name is Nick Cohen, and I think I’m turning into a Jew,” Cohen tells his 
British Jewish readers. “Despite being called ‘Cohen’, I’ve never been Jewish 
before. It’s not simply that I am an atheist. My Jewish friends tell me that it 
is hard to find an educated London Jew who is not an atheist, but that I have 
no connection with Jewish culture.”

For years I had been following Cohen defusing his Jewishness repeatedly. This 
time Cohen seems to surrender, he lets go, he’s let himself be a Jew. Yet, for 
some reason he insists upon untangling the notion of Jewishness and elaborating 
on religious perspective as if Jewishness has something to do with being 
observant. This tendency is rather bizarre. Cohen must be familiar enough with 
the subject to know that one does not have to be an observant Jew in order to 
consider oneself as a Jew. Unlike Islam and Christianity, Jewishness is not a 
belief system at all. While Muslims believe in God and Christians believe that 
Jesus is God, the Jew can believe in almost everything without ceasing to be a 
Jew. A Jew could believe in Marx, Bolshevism, Holocaust, secularism, democracy 
and even lizards. Consequently, what makes a Jew into a Jew is the belief in 
“the Jew”, in Jewish suffering and in Jewish uniqueness,

When talking to a strictly Jewish audience, Cohen tends to celebrate his 
“exceptional Jewish circumstances” with his readers. “The Jewish side of my 
family is my father’s (which is not a help, I gather).” 

A friend pointed out to me a while ago that only when she is with her Jewish 
friends she always happens to know where Papa’le and Mama’le are from, and she 
always knows how the grandparents managed to survive the big war. 

Cohen is apparently no different. As we launch into Cohen’s identity expedition 
we get familiar with Papa’le and Mama’le racial background. Cohen is also a 
dedicated protagonist of the kosher victim historical narrative. “My great 
grandparents fled from the Tsarist empire at the time of the pogroms.” Not only 
did they flee, they even became communists – a common Jewish political choice 
at the turn of the 20th century.

One may wonder at this stage what lead Cohen the “pro-war secular atheist” to 
admit that he had become a “kosher” subject after so many years of relentless 
denial. “My sole interest in Jewish concerns came from being a left-wing 
opponent of the far right and the blood-soaked anti-Semitic superstitions which 
turned Europe into a graveyard.”

Certainly, Cohen starts to come up with the goods. We now learn that when Cohen 
was a “leftist”, so to speak, it was because the left was serving the Jewish 
tribal interests in fighting “far-right anti-Semitic superstitions”.

But those days seem to have passed. According to Cohen, the left fails to do 
its job; it does not work for the Jews any more. “Today the old certainties 
have gone because there are two far-right movements: the white neo-Nazi parties 
that the left still opposes; and the clerical fascists of radical Islam which, 
extraordinarily, the modern left succours and indulges.”

Seemingly, according to Cohen, the leftists have shunned the Jews and support 
the clerical fascists of radical Islam. “I am not only talking about Ken 
Livingstone, George Galloway and their gruesome accomplices in the 
intelligentsia. Wider liberal society is almost as complicit.”

At this point Cohen’s list of Judaeophobes grows by the second. It is actually 
not only the leftists and liberals, it’s apparently the entire world that’s 
leaving the Jews to face their doomed fate. “From the broadcasters, through the 
liberal press, the civil service, the Metropolitan Police, the bench of bishops 
and the judiciary, anti-Semitism is no longer an unthinkable mental 
deformation”.

Cohen’s take on the subject is rather illuminating. Yet I wonder: if Cohen 
believes in what he says, the most rational and reasonable thing to do would be 
to run as far as possible away from Judaism, Jewishness and the Jews. But as it 
seems, Cohen is doing the opposite: he is running straight into the cage, he 
rushes to the shtetl as if he were trying to seek shelter in a synagogue. This 
is indeed a very Jewish thing to do. Yet, this very behaviour deserves some 
intellectual attention because this exact pattern can be seen as essential to 
understanding the Jewish suicidal collectivism detected in Israel and its 
supportive lobbies and agents. 

Noticeably, when writing for Jews, Cohen allows himself to employ the most 
racist ideas and expressions. “As long as the conspiracy theories of the 
counter-enlightenment come from ideologues with dark rather than white skins, 
nominally liberal men and women will not speak out.” Someone should remind the 
Observer columnist that ideologies do not have “skin” and ideologues cannot 
choose the colour of their skin either. Hence, to refer to ideologues with dark 
skin is far beyond bigotry. It is racism per se. And yet, Cohen will get away 
with it because he is “kosher” as he himself admits. In contemporary Britain, a 
Dutch right-wing racist MP is deported for making a film, yet a racist can be a 
prominent columnist for the &i&Observer&. This is actually a good thing. It is 
probably the last remnant of Britain’s legendary liberalism. In the UK, bigotry 
and racism are becoming a Jews-only territory. You might want to ask yourself 
why we stop a Dutch MP yet we let Melanie Philips and Nick Cohen celebrate 
their symptoms on paper. One possible answer is that we expect a Dutch 
Christian to be a humanist, yet we allow the racially-orientated tribal 
campaigner to be a racist bigot. We expect them to advocate wars, we expect 
them to refer to people’s skin and colour.

Cohen says about himself. “My experience of left-wing anti-Semitism has changed 
the way I think and made me, if you like, more Jewish.” While a rabbi may be 
inclined to take advantage of this revelation and rush to Cohen’s dwelling, 
equipped with the necessary gear to kosherly modify the tip of his manhood, I 
must admit that I just happen to be slightly confused. What is it that Cohen 
refers to when claiming to be “more Jewish"? Is Jewishness a matter of degree 
or quantity? As far as I understand it, Jewishness, as opposed to Judaism (a 
religion) and the Jews (a people), is a matter of ideology. In fact, no one can 
really be more Jewish than Cohen. He possesses all the elementary ideological 
ingredients, he differentiates the value of people’s ideas based on the colour 
of their skin. He promotes war as a valid resolution to international problems. 
Yes, he may not be religious at this stage of his article. But surely most of 
those who follow the Jewish ideology have nothing to do with Judaism either.

Cohen is convinced that he may be able to fool some people with a minor lefty 
cliché statement against Israeli settlements. “Although I want to see every 
Israeli settlement on the West Bank dismantled, it was clear to me that when 
Hamas fired thousands of rockets into Israel it had declared war and had to 
accept the consequences.” Cohen doesn’t realize that, after Gaza, we do not 
differentiate between the West Bank and Tel Aviv. Israel is basically a big 
occupied territory that is stretched over historic Palestine. The Jews-only 
state will have to go. It simply doesn’t have the right to exist. If it ever 
had a justification, it lost it a long time ago. With 94 per cent of Israeli 
Jews supporting the massacre in Gaza, with Cohen advocating war in Iraq and 
justifying the slaughter of civilians in Gaza, we are left with no other option 
but to expect some growing resentment towards Israel, the Jewish state and 
Jewish interests in general. 

Interestingly, Cohen is already preparing his Jewish readers for the inevitable 
pogrom. “If a synagogue is attacked,” says Cohen, “I guarantee that within 
minutes the airwaves will be filled with insinuating voices insisting that the 
“root cause” of the crime was a rational anger at the behaviour of Israel or 
the Jewish diaspora.” Cohen is probably right. Without justifying any violent 
act whatsoever, the reasoning behind resentment towards Israel and Jews is 
rational. In fact, Cohen is himself a “root cause” for such hatred. Cohen, who 
supported the illegal war in Iraq, a war that led to the death of 1.3 million 
innocent civilians and millions of refugees, should have stood up long ago and 
said: I was wrong, I was a fool, I regret it all. Cohen failed to do so. 
Instead, he runs back to the ghetto and succumbs to the most radical form of 
Jewish tribal ideology. In support of Cohen, it must be said that at least the 
man is genuine and authentic. Tony Blair and George Bush do not have a 
community that would embrace them that warmly. Except of course the Jewish 
state.* <http://www.redress.cc/stooges/gatzmon20090308#dan_david> 

Cohen concludes his Jewish Chronicle article by stating his Judaeo-centric, 
hostile mantra. “I believe that I can see some being pushed into taking the 
same journey I have taken and finding their views towards Judaism and Israel 
softening as they realize that anti-Semitism helps drive the fascistic 
ideologies of the 21st century just as it drove the Nazism of the 20th century.”

In his final paragraph, for an alleged secularist atheist and egalitarian who’s 
reverted to Judaism, the issue is no longer about being an ethnic Jew, it is 
not about being a cultural Jew or even about being a secular tribal Jew. It is 
now all about “Judaism”. Cohen expects people out there to find their “views 
towards Judaism. Seemingly, Cohen who starts his Jewish Chronicle journey by 
taking issues with identity, sums it up by preaching religion. Quite a 
substantial leap, I would say. The Observer columnist who claimed to be an 
atheist secularist ends up taking the role of a radical messianic rabbi 
admitting a homogenous bond between Jews, Judaism and Israel.

Such a declaration is actually symptomatic of the most radical Zionists within 
the far-right messianic school. It is no wonder Cohen is writing for the Jewish 
Chronicle. Yet one may wonder how come such a Judaeo-centric fundamentalist 
cleric still holds a regular column in the Observer. It must be that British 
freedom of speech is reserved for self-loving Jews, and for them alone.

  _____  

*The Tel Aviv-based Dan David Foundation has just awarded Blair with one 
million dollars, an award for his “leadership on the world stage”. Indeed, not 
many world leaders were as committed to killing so many innocent civilians in 
the name of democracy. Not many world leaders agreed to recruit their armies 
for fighting Israeli wars.
  _____  

Gilad <http://www.gilad.co.uk/>  Atzmon is an Israeli-born musician, writer and 
anti-racism campaigner. A version of this article appeared in Palestine 
<http://palestinethinktank.com/>  Think Tank.

 

 

Redress Information & Analysis

Website  - http://www.redress.cc

Newsblog - http://redressnewsblog.blogspot.com

YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/redressvideo

blip.tv channel - http://redress.blip.tv

Twitter channel - http://twitter.com/redress

 

Redress Information & Analysis is dedicated to exposing injustice,

disinformation and bigotry and to providing thought-provoking interpretations

of current affairs.

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT 
LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: 
Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check 
http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr for more real news posts and support the truth! 
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book download:  
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  *** Revealing the hidden Truth For 
Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential 
Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails 
without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or 
legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone 
other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of 
the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 
5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts 
represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement 
only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line 
"REMOVE"


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to