-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Redress Information & Analysis

Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:10 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [Alert] The questionable democratic principles of Israel and its 
apologists

 

New on REDRESS INFORMATION & ANALYSIS website:

 

ARTICLE  - "What kind of democracy is that?" The questionable democratic

principles of Israel and its apologists

 

LOCATION (URL) -

http://www.redress.cc/palestine/pjballes20090425 

 

SYNOPSIS - Paul J. Balles questions the alleged democratic principles of the

countries that succumbed to Israeli lobbying and decided to boycott Iranian

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speech at the UN anti-racism conference in

Geneva on 20 April, in which he condemned the racist nature and practice of the

Jews-only state of Israel.

 

FOR THE FULL STORY, GO TO:

http://www.redress.cc/palestine/pjballes20090425

 

--

What kind of democracy is that? 

  _____  


The questionable democratic principles of Israel and its apologists 


By Paul J. Balles <http://www.redress.cc/palestine/pjballes20090425#bio> 

25 April 2009

Paul J. Balles questions the alleged democratic principles of the countries 
that succumbed to Israeli lobbying and decided to boycott Iranian President 
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speech at the UN anti-racism conference in Geneva on 20 
April, in which he condemned the racist nature and practice of the Jews-only 
state of Israel.

According to Press TV: "President Ahmadinejad was scheduled to deliver a speech 
at the Webster University in Geneva, Switzerland, and later participate in a 
question and answer session, but the event was cancelled after intense Israeli 
lobbying."

Why would Israel lobby against a speech? They knew it would be critical of 
Israel. But Israel is a democracy, often touted as the only democracy in the 
Middle East. When they stop criticism, what kind of democracy is that?

Press TV reports: "The Iranian president arrived in Geneva on Sunday [19 April] 
to attend a UN-backed Durban Review Conference against racism, xenophobia and 
intolerance beginning on Monday."

What was Israel's response? "Tel Aviv stepped up efforts to convince European 
countries to boycott the meeting and to abstain from meeting the Iranian 
president, a vocal critic of Israel." What kind of democracy is that?

More from Press TV: "Israel also recalled its ambassador to Switzerland, Ilan 
Elgar, in protest to the UN conference that was boycotted by Tel Aviv's allies."

Tel Aviv's allies included Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand the 
United States, Sweden, Australia, Canada and Poland, all democracies boycotting 
speeches. What kind of democracy is that?

Press TV had more to report: "The United States and Israel walked out of the 
first UN racism conference in Durban in 2001, which condemned Israeli 
atrocities against Palestinians and sought to pass a resolution likening 
Zionism to racism."

Something of principle might be argued for so-called democracies to boycott a 
forum when they're sure, based on past experience, that a speaker's criticism 
will be unjustified and untrue. But the criticism in 2001 was true and 
justified. What kind of democracy is that?

American/Israeli lawyer Alan Dershowitz said on the sidelines of the Durban 
Review Conference that Switzerland's president was supportive of “hate 
mongering” and that the anti-apartheid activist Desmond Tutu was a “racist and 
bigot”.

Both statements, typical of Dershowitz, are patently untrue and unjustified. 
Instead of taking part in the conference, Dershowitz, Elie Weisel, actor Jon 
Voight and 14 Israeli students set up a special media room to provide immediate 
responses to anti-Israeli statements.
What kind of democracy is that?

Gilad Atzmon wrote: "What we saw yesterday at the UN Anti Racism Forum was 
crude collective institutional Islamophobic racism in the making, a coordinated 
show of rabid Western chauvinism. A bunch of European diplomats behaving as a 
herd of sheep, exhibiting complete denial of the notion of freedom of speech 
and the culture of debate."

Why would members of these celebrated democracies walk away from an open 
debate?  Why would they not face Ahmadinejad and make their own arguments? What 
were they / are they afraid of? What kind of democracy is that?

What was it that Dershowitz and his gang accused Ahmadinejad of? They called 
him a racist and a bigot. Why? Because Ahmadinejad called Israel a racist 
state. Gilad Atzmon, born and raised an Israeli Jew, said: "Israel is indeed a 
racist state!"

Dershowitz also called Ahmadinejad a bigot. However, it's Dershowitz who is the 
bigot. Atzmon says: "…this flock of Western diplomats shouldn’t have been 
participating in an ‘anti-racism forum’ in the first place. The fact that they 
have behaved intolerantly proves that they and the governments behind them are 
the root cause of current racism, namely Islamophobia." What kind of democracy 
is that?
 
Amnesty International said it was "dismayed" by the boycott and urged 
governments not to "politicize" the meeting. However, they did. Amnesty said: 
"True conviction in combating racism requires governments to be there to stand 
up for what is right and to reject forcefully what is objectionable," That’s 
the kind of democracy that we need.

  _____  

Paul J. Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer 
who has lived in the Middle East for many years. For more information, see 
http://www.pballes.com <http://www.redress.cc/palestine/www.pballes.com> .

 

 

Redress Information & Analysis

Website  - http://www.redress.cc

Newsblog - http://redressnewsblog.blogspot.com

YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/redressvideo

blip.tv channel - http://redress.blip.tv

Twitter channel - http://twitter.com/redress

 

Redress Information & Analysis is dedicated to exposing injustice,

disinformation and bigotry and to providing thought-provoking interpretations

of current affairs.

 

______________________________________________

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT 
LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: 
Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check 
http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr for more real news posts and support the truth! 
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book download:  
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  *** Revealing the hidden Truth For 
Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential 
Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails 
without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or 
legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone 
other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of 
the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 
5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts 
represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement 
only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line 
"REMOVE"


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to