From: 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:35 PM
Subject: Why Israeli Jew Uri Davis joined Fatah to save Palestine

 


Why Israeli Jew Uri Davis joined Fatah to save Palestine


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/23/uri-davis-interview-israel-fatah-palestine




The first Jewish member of the Revolutionary Council of Fatah talks about a 
unique political journey

 <http://observer.guardian.co.uk/> The Observer, Sunday 23 August 2009 

 

Image removed by sender. Uri Davis, left, at a Fatah meeting in Ramallah

Uri Davis, left, at a Fatah meeting in Ramallah. Photograph: Abbas Momani

 

Uri Davis is used to denunciations. A "traitor", "scum", "mentally unstable": 
those are just some of the condemnations that have been posted in the Israeli 
blogosphere in recent days. As the first person of Jewish origin to be elected 
to the Revolutionary Council of the Palestinian Fatah movement, an organisation 
once dominated by Yasser Arafat, Davis has tapped a deep reserve of Israeli 
resentment. Some have even called for him to be deported.

He has been here before, not least as the man who first proposed the critique 
of Israel <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/israel>  as an "apartheid state" in 
the late 1980s. Davis's involvement in the first UN World Conference Against 
Racism in Durban in 2001 was condemned by the Anti-Defamation League. During a 
career of protest he has been described – inevitably – as a "self-hating Jew". 
He calls himself an "anti-Zionist"

. And his personal history is a fascinating testimony to the troubled history 
of the postwar Israeli left and forgotten trajectories in the story of Israel 
itself.

The man elected to the Revolutionary Council in 31st place from a field of 600 
has been as much shaped by the tidal forces of recent Jewish history – not 
least his own family's sufferings in the Holocaust – as any fellow citizen of 
Israel. But he disputes a largely manufactured account of that experience that 
he believes has been used deliberately "to camouflage" its "apartheid 
programme". Now he enjoys an extraordinary mandate to explain his own views. 
And he hopes, too, that just as the small number of white members of the ANC 
widened its legitimacy during the apartheid era in South Africa, other Jews can 
be attracted to participate in Fatah, transforming it into a broader-based 
movement that stands for equal rights for both Arabs and Jews in a federated 
state.

So what does Davis believe, and  why? His father was a British Jew who met his 
mother, a Czech, in British Mandatory Palestine in the mid-1930s, where they 
married in 1939, four years before his birth. While his mother escaped the 
transports to the gas chambers at Auschwitz, many in her family did not. It is 
a familiar story in Israel. But the lesson that Davis learnt from it was 
different from the vast majority of Jews who concluded that never again could 
Jews depend on others to guarantee their security from persecution.

"An important part of the education that I received from my parents," Davis 
recalled last week, "was never to generalise. To beware of every sentence that 
begins with 'all'. It was not 'all' Germans who killed my mother's family. It 
was some Nazis." Another distinction was emphasised by his mother. "If she 
heard the suggestion of vengeance, she would be horrified. She sought justice. 
One of the biggest problems addressing a Zionist audience is that the 
distinction between justice and vengeance has collapsed."
He is 66 now, but that warning from his parents on the risk of demonising the 
Other still resonates in Davis's language. He is insistent that generalities 
should be avoided, not least the "normative idea all Israelis are exposed to: 
that all Arabs hate the Jews and all Arabs want to drive the Jews into the sea".

His own self-description is a case in point, fine-tuned over the decades. "It 
has gone through a number of stages. In my autobiography in the mid-1990s I 
described myself as a Palestinian Jew. That has now changed to a Palestinian 
Hebrew of Jewish origins." How he frames his own identity is part of his 
attempt to impose an "alternative narrative" to the one that has dominated 
Israel since its foundation in 1948 by what he describes as "a 
settler-colonialist" strand of Zionism built on a massive act of "ethnic 
cleansing". That moment – known as the "Nakba", or the catastrophe to Arabs – 
saw the flight of 650,000-750,000 Palestinians who fled or were expelled from 
their homes by Jewish forces.

Davis is careful with his definitions of both "Zionism" and his own 
"anti-Zionism". The Zionism that he opposes is the "political Zionism" of 
Israel's founders, the Zionism that amounts, he says, to land grab based on 
ethnic cleansing.

Davis himself insists on reclaiming a wider meaning for the word, not least 
because he was shaped, as he grew up, by a different school: the "spiritual 
Zionism" of thinkers such as Ahad Ha'am, religious philosopher Martin Buber and 
Judah Magnes, co-founder of Jerusalem's Hebrew University.

In contrast to political Zionism, which saw Jewish statehood alone as a 
solution to the Jewish question, these spiritual Zionists believed Palestine 
could not accommodate a Jewish homeland but should become a national spiritual 
centre that would support and reinvigorate the Jewish diaspora.

Davis has written how his own "intellectual and moral development was 
profoundly influenced by Buber's writings" although he has fiercely condemned 
Buber's later actions, not least Buber's appropriation of a house in Jerusalem 
belonging to the family of the late Palestinian activist and writer Edward Said.

Then there was Leon Roth, one of his father's relatives and a fellow professor 
of Buber at the new Hebrew University. Roth resigned his post after witnessing 
the treatment of the Palestinian Arabs in the creation of Israel and returned 
to Cambridge.
But if these were formative influences on Davis, it is how he interpreted what 
he saw growing up in the young state of Israel that marked him out as 
different. Reading Gandhi and Martin Luther King led him to a pacifist position 
that saw him refuse military service in the 1960s, at a time when it was almost 
unheard of. He was eventually assigned to "alternative" service working on a 
kibbutz on the border with the Gaza Strip.

"I refused to participate in the armed patrols of the kibbutz fence on the 
border and that led to daily shouting matches. Then one of the members took me 
to the periphery of the kibbutz where there was a cluster of eucalyptus trees. 
He said: 'What can you see?' And I said trees. Then he took me into the wood 
and showed me a pile of stones. He asked me what I could see and I said: 'A 
pile of stones.' He said: 'No. This is the [Arab] village of Dirma. Its 
residents are refugees while we cultivate their land. Now do you understand why 
they hate us and want to drive us into the sea?

"And I said, 'But there is an alternative. We could invite them back and share 
it with them.'" He pauses. "If looks could kill. I saw that he saw me as a 
hopeless case. And I'm proud to say I'm still that hopeless case."

Davis experienced a second moment of epiphany decades later during the first 
Gulf war, when Iraq was firing Scud missiles at Israel – a moment of insight 
related to an unresolved question from his childhood. "I was born in Jerusalem, 
but I grew up on a farm near Herziliya. I would walk with my peers down to the 
beach and pass the ruins of an Arab village under the shadow of a mosque that 
was still intact. And the dominant narrative deleted the reality. The elders of 
my community said they had pleaded with the elders of the Arab village to stay. 
And the elders of the Arab village refused. I had no way to challenge this for 
decades.
"During the first Gulf war the penny dropped. The mayor of Tel Aviv was abusing 
all those residents who had fled under the threat from Scuds. After the war 
ended, the families returned. They used their keys. Put their cash cards in the 
ATMs. Re-opened their shops. What was significant was that no one said to them: 
anyone who has left has lost their property rights. That was my second 
crossroads."

Davis published Israel: An Apartheid State in 1987. He distinguishes between 
racism and apartheid, which, he argues, requires not simply an official value 
system that distinguishes on a racial basis but a legal reality. Indeed, Davis 
has written that it is wrong to single out Israel on the grounds that it is 
more racist than other states in the UN. Rather he believes it should be 
singled out because, as he wrote in a letter to Al-Ahram newspaper in 2003, "it 
applies the force of law to compel its citizens to make racial choices, first 
and foremost in all matters pertaining to access to land, housing and freedom 
of residence".

Davis's lifetime of dissent has not been without consequences. After joining 
Fatah, Davis began a long period of "de facto exile" at the suggestion of his 
lawyer to avoid a show trial. He taught during that time at a number of British 
universities, including Bradford, Exeter and Durham.

Returning to Israel and the Occupied Territories in the mid-1990s, following 
the Oslo Accords, Davis struggled for years to secure an appointment at an 
Israeli academic institution. " I kept my affiliation with Exeter and Durham, 
which helped me with periodical research that they farmed out to me. I also had 
an inheritance." It was only recently that he was appointed to teach a course 
at the Palestinian Al-Quds university on critical Israeli studies.

His marriage in 2008 to a Palestinian woman has not made life easier for him. 
She has been denied a permit to live in Israel, while Davis is forbidden by 
Israeli law to live in an area under Palestinian authority control as an 
Israeli citizen. In consequence, he is vague both about the circumstances of 
his conversion to Islam shortly before the wedding and where he now lives, 
describing those arrangements as "private".

What does he hope to achieve as a Palestinian Hebrew who is a full member of 
the Revolutionary Council?
His core message, he explains, is "to suggest" to his new colleagues that there 
is nothing to fear in recognising the notion of a Jewish state. "The correct 
response is that we will not recognise an Israel defined by political Zionism." 
And perhaps just as importantly, Davis believes that Fatah can expand its role 
from representing only Palestinian Arabs to representing all of those who 
oppose "settler-colonialism".

"It cannot win the struggle for equality that it has waged for so long as long 
as it remains only representative of Palestinians. To win the moral [high 
ground] it has to project itself as a democratic alternative for all. That is 
the message I first delivered and that I have persevered with and has led to my 
election to the Revolutionary Council after 25 years." It seems unlikely that 
condemnations on Israeli websites will prevent Uri Davis from giving up on his 
unique mission now.


Versions of Zionism


Zionism Coined by Nathan Birnbaum (1864-1937) in 1890, who also first 
articulated the idea of political Zionism.

Political Zionism Associated most closely with Theodor Herzl (1860 - 1904), who 
saw the Jewish issue as a political one requiring action in the international 
arena.

Spiritual Zionism Associated with Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927). Believed Judaism 
needed to reinvigorate its cultural assets. Argued for limited settlement in 
Palestine and focused on educational activity.

Revisionist Zionism Associated with Vladimir (Ze'ev) Jabotinsky (1880-1940). 
Argued for a Jewish state on both sides of the Jordan.

Modern Zionism According to the Anti-Defamation League: "Zionism stands for a 
safe and secure Israel open to all Jews seeking refuge and a Jewish homeland, 
the preservation of Judaism and Jewish people." Its harshest critics - like Uri 
Davis - argue that the dominant form of political zionism since the foundation 
of Israel in 1948 represents "settler-colonialist" project.

 

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT 
LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: 
Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check  
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr for more real news posts 
and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book 
download:   <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> 
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  *** Revealing the hidden Truth For 
Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential 
Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails 
without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or 
legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone 
other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of 
the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 
5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts 
represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement 
only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line 
"REMOVE"

 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to