From: Jaeger Research Insitute [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: The Ultimate Straw Argument

 

 

 


The Ultimate Straw Argument
posted on 09/05/2009 12:45 PM by James_Jaeger
<http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/profile.php?id=178> 

[ <http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/show_thread.php?rootID=154505#top> Top]
[ <http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/show_thread.php?rootID=154505> Show
Index]
[ <http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/post.php?reply=154541> Reply to this
post]
[ <http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/show_thread.php?rootID=154505> Not MindX
Material]




 

Okay, I have studied the New York Times article by Paul Krugman, such at
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?_r=2&ref=busin
ess> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Econo
mic-t.html?_r=2&ref=business Let's address its thesis-statement, to wit: 

But the main division was between those who insisted that free-market
economies never go astray and those who believed that economies may stray
now and then but that any major deviations from the path of prosperity could
and would be corrected by the all-powerful Fed. Neither side was prepared to
cope with an economy that went off the rails despite the Fed's best efforts.




Invariably apologists, such as Krugman at the New York Times, use
applications of "Critical Theory," a technology of CULTURAL MARXISM in order
to instill a "cultural pessimism" about the U.S. Republic, capitalism,
free-enterprise, the Constitution and/or traditional values. The young or
naive student of economics, history and sociology does not realize this,
because the political scientists at the Frankfurt School have designed their
arguments against Western civilization to look "rational." This is called
"political correctness". Thus if you strive for "political correctness" in
any of your dealings, then YOU have been a victim of the Frankfurt School's
CULTURAL MARXISM.(1) 

In short, Marx nor Marcuse attacked "free-market enterprise" -- they only
attached "capitalism" and the infrastructure that underpins it, such as the
family unit, Christian values and the middle class. 

The reason Marx did not attack FREE-MARKET ENTERPRISE is because he was
intelligent enough to realize that this was a battle he could never win.
Thus, the genius of Marx was commingling the words "capitalism" and
"free-enterprise" in the public mind, so when capitalism inevitably
corrupted and failed, it would blow away free-enterprise as a straw. 

Since the turn of the 19th Century, most students of economics and history
have realized that capitalism is subject to corruption by monopolists, such
as John Rockefeller, and the so-called robber barons, however, the general
public does NOT realize the distinction between capitalism and
free-enterprise. Thus, again, when capitalism fails -- because of monopoly,
oligopoly, government regulation, favors and/or fiat currency -- the failure
is cross-collateralized with free-enterprise. 

There are thus at least four important things to recognize in order to sort
this out: 

1. Free-enterprise only works if there is ZERO government intervention or
interference. 

2. Government intervention is ANY price-fixing, favoritism, corporate
subsidies, regulations on business or use of fiat currency. 

3. The economy we have been in since 1913 has NOT been, even close to, a
free-market economy. 

4. The Federal Reserve System is a government-sanctioned banking cartel (a
government-licensed MONOPOLY or oligopoly over money creation). This is
PROOF that we do NOT have a free market economy. 

Point four alone disqualifies the U.S. economy as anything NEAR free-market
because the cartel of ELITE NEW YORK (as in New York Times) BANKS has a
MONOPOLY on money, i.e., the QUANTITY of money (monetizing debt) and the
PRICE of money (interest) -- a commodity that represents all products and
services in the economy. This is price-fixing in the fullest sense of the
term. 

Thus, given 1 - 4 it's foolish to state, as the New York (Times) Marxist
apologist states: 

... any major deviations from the path of prosperity could and would be
corrected by the all-powerful Fed. 


Ironically, this statement is only foolish, on one level, as it's brilliant
-- if you see the overall agenda since the 1960s. 

It's foolish because the Fed is the entity that has CAUSED the economic
crash. It caused it because it constantly INTERVENES in the free-market by
printing money and making credit available to major corporations and
government at ARTIFICIAL levels. This, at the very least, violates points 1
and 2 above. Thus, the very entity that CRASHED the economy is charged with
FIXING the economy?! Please. This broken down think, when accepted, is what
I am referring to when I say most of the human population is irrational or
insane. 

It's brilliant because the goal of Cultural Marxism is to invalidate
capitalism, thus by association, the free-market. The tool that does this is
"Critical Theory" the exact operation of which I go into in detail in my new
documentary, ORIGINAL INTENT.(1) 

Here is the situation in summary: 

At the extremes of the economic spectrum you have two conditions: 

A. Absolutely NO government intervention, regulation, price-fixing,
sanctioned entities, unconstitutional delegation, interference or special
favors in connection with any and all PRODUCTS, SERVICES and CURRENCY. This
is known as FREE-MARKET ENTERPRISE or FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM 

B. Total government intervention, regulation, price-fixing, sanctioned
entities, interference and special favors in connection with all PRODUCTS,
SERVICES and CURRENCY. This is known as TOTALITARIANISM or OLIGARCHY
(whether communist or fascist in nature). 

A is the enemy of B. B is the enemy of A. 

A represents a distributed command network. 

B represents a centralized command hierarchy. 

A is the enemy of B and B the enemy of A because A and B play a ZERO-SUM
game against each other in a given system (i.e., a given country or planet).


Centralized command requires that all NODES be brought under one (or few)
NODE(s) for the purpose of computational focus. Distributed command requires
that all NODES freely share data and disperse computation. 

THEORETICALLY a centralized structure CAN be as good and efficient as a
distributed structure provided: 

i. the computational ability at the command center is equal to or stronger
than the sum of the computational abilities at distributed nodes, and; 

ii the data lines are of sufficient bandwidth to handle the I/O flow of the
central command. 

If i and ii are present, this is where one gets their "benevolent ruler" or
"philosopher king" or "strong man" government, or IBM super computer. And
such CAN be successful -- for a while. Hitler was successful -- for a
while.(2) 

BUT HERE'S THE FLY IN THE OINTMENT WITH CENTRALIZED COMMAND, also known as
the LEADER PRINCIPLE: 

It fails to operate on the principle of redundancy, a principle the Universe
seems to have used in order to maintain its survival for over 14.7 billion
Earth years. 

o If this principle were not important, there would NOT be a complete copy
of the DNA molecule in every single cell in the human body. 

o If this principle were not important, there would NOT be such a diversity
of species and fecundity in the biosphere. 

o If this principle were not important, human intelligence would have
centralized into one, or few, large human being-brains rather than 6.3
billion human brains spread all over the planet. 

o If this principle were not important, the Internet would never exist. 

So, at least one major factor makes a distributed network (free-enterprise
capitalism) superior to a centralized command structure (monopoly
capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism) is REDUNDANCY. Further proof of
this is in the current global bank meltdown. Since all world financial
systems are now connected, when one major node gets sick, all nodes get
sick. This, as well as a one-world government or one-world economic system
is thus a recipe for disaster. 

This is why I have repeatedly stated that scientists and technologist, who
understand networks, should take a larger role in government and economic
policies -- otherwise you leave the fate of the world, as well as yours, to
drug-ridden, idiots, morons and apologists. 

James Jaeger 

------------------- 
(1) See  <http://www.fiatempire.com/producers>
http://www.FiatEmpire.com/producers 

(2) One could argue that SAI could provide the perfect "leader" in a
post-Singularity world, however this presupposes that such SAI will be
cooperative with humanity and/or its military-industrial-banking complex
creators. 

[ <http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/post.php?reply=154541> Reply] [
<http://www.kurzweilai.net/mindx/show_thread.php?rootID=154505#id154505>
Parent]

 

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check  <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr
for more real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time
to email all posts) free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to