----- Original Message ----- 
From: "m.... s..."
To: "John Wilson" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:14 PM
Subject: NEW JERSEY COURT DISMISSES FORECLOSURE FILED BY DEUTSCHE BANK


NEW JERSEY COURT DISMISSES FORECLOSURE FILED BY DEUTSCHE BANK FOR FAILURE TO 
PROVIDE DISCOVERY AS TO OWNER AND HOLDER OF NOTE, SECURUTIZED TRUST 
DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS DEMANDED BY BORROWERS

July 14, 2009

In a stunning victory for borrowers, a New Jersey court has dismissed a 
foreclosure action filed against the borrowers by Deutsche Bank Trust 
Company America as alleged trustee for a securitized mortgage loan trust 
after Deutsche Bank willfully, and despite the entry of three (3) separate 
court orders, refused to produce documents demanded by the borrowers which 
included documents setting forth the identity of the true owner and holder 
of the Note and mortgage, the complete chain of title to ownership of the 
note and mortgage, payment application histories, and documents as to the 
securitized mortgage loan trust. The Court had given Deutsche Bank multiple 
opportunities and extensions of time to produce the documents, but Deutsche 
Bank continually refused to produce any of the documents requested, 
resulting in the dismissal of Deutsche Bank’s foreclosure action. The Court 
also ruled that Deutsche Bank is not permitted to re-file any foreclosure 
action
 until it is prepared to produce ALL of the subject discovery.

FDN attorney Jeff Barnes, Esq. represented the borrowers, assisted by local 
New Jersey counsel.

W. J. Barnes, P.A. has numerous other cases pending where similar discovery 
requests have been sent to Deutsche Bank, none of which have been complied 
with to date. As such, additional requests for sanctions, including 
dismissal, are expected to be filed in these cases.

Deutsche Bank was also the subject of a recent ruling in a case in New York 
where the Court denied Deutsche Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment, finding 
that a purported assignment from MERS to Deutsche Bank was defective and 
that Deutsche Bank, with an invalid assignment of the mortgage and note from 
MERS, lacked standing to foreclose. Significant in the ruling was the court’s 
observation and question as to why, 142 days after the borrower was claimed 
to be in default, that MERS would assign a “toxic” loan to Deutsche Bank. 
The court also required a satisfactory explanation, by sworn Affidavit, from 
an officer of the securitized trust as to why, in the middle of “our 
national subprime mortgage financial crisis”, Deutsche Bank would purchase 
from MERS, as alleged “nominee”, a nonperforming loan. The court further 
inquired as to whether Deutsche Bank violated a corporate fiduciary duty to 
the note holders of the securitized mortgage loan
 trust with the purchase of a loan that had defaulted 142 days prior to its 
assignment from MERS to the trust.

It appears that Deutsche Bank may have done so to take advantage of one or 
more “credit enhancements” inside of the securitized mortgage loan trust 
which pay benefits upon declaration of default. These credit enhancements 
are extremely complicated and multi-layered, and are required by law in 
connection with the issuance and sale of the mortgage-backed securities 
“backed” by the trust.

The assignment of the mortgage and note to the securitized trust, which were 
already in default well in advance of the assignment, would permit Deutsche 
Bank to both realize a profit through payment of credit enhancement benefits 
(which effect a pay down of the claimed “default”) while simultaneously 
permitting Deutsche Bank to institute a foreclosure, resulting in a “double 
dip” for Deutsche Bank. This is, of course, illegal, but unless competent 
counsel raises the issue, it goes unnoticed and Deutsche Bank, like so many 
other foreclosing parties, winds up stealing the borrowers’ property and 
getting paid for doing it.

Jeff Barnes, Esq.

www.ForeclosureDefenseNationwide.com




 
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT 
LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: 
Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check 
for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to 
email all posts) at http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or  
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can 
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to 
[email protected] ; free book download:  
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  *** Revealing the hidden Truth For 
Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential 
Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails 
without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or 
legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone 
other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of 
the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 
5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts 
represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement 
only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line 
"REMOVE"


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to