From: Gary Kohls [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:38 AM
To: Gary Kohls
Subject: Next Friday's Duty to Warn article: The Synthetic Sweetener Splenda
is a Poisonous Chlorocarbon

 

For more information on aspartame and Splenda click on the Aspartame
Information List on http://www.wnho.net <http://www.wnho.net/> . Dr. Bowen
can be seen in the movie "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" For the movie call
1 818 349 8822 or email  <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]  See how aspartame was approved by clicking
on http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/Rumsfeld2.html


Aspartame and Splenda Toxicity Centers, <
<http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame%3Ewww.holisticmed.com/aspartame>
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame>www.holisticmed.com/aspartame 

Russell Blaylock, M.D., has published Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills on
the subject, <
<http://www.russellblaylockmd.com%3Ewww.russellblaylockmd.com/>
http://www.russellblaylockmd.com>www.russellblaylockmd.com

 

Dr.Kohls is a retired Duluth, MN physician who practiced holistic mental
health care until his retirement in 2008. He writes about peace, justice and
health issues and is the editor of the occasional Preventive Psychiatry
E-Newsletter. His website is www.mindbodymedicineduluth.com
<http://www.mindbodymedicineduluth.com/> ; Videointerviews of Dr. Kohls'
thoughts on holistic mental health care can be viewed at:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gary+kohls&search_type=&aq=f 

 

 

 


Duty to Warn: 


The Synthetic Sweetener Splenda is a Poisonous Chlorocarbon


 


By Gary G. Kohls, MD


 

"Splenda" is the branded name of the popular synthetic sweetener and food
additive whose generic name is "sucralose". Both very sweet-sounding names
have been cunningly invented by some Food, Inc marketing team. But, the most
chemically accurate term for this ubiquitous substance is: trichlorinated
sucrose. Splenda is hidden in over 3000 common foods, candy, beverages and
chewing gum.

 

Sucrose, the base molecule, is common table sugar and, being a natural
substance, can't be patented in its natural form. However, drug and food
corporations do have their clever ways to fool Mother Nature, the public and
the FDA into granting them monopoly privileges on their way to billions of
dollars of profit, even at the expense of the public health. Splenda has
replaced the toxic sweetener NutraSweet (aspartame) as the number 1
artificial, non-nutritive sweetener in America because of increasing
awareness of its toxicity and a cause of chronic illnesses around the world.

 


Splenda unproven to be safe at any dose


 

Sucralose is synthesized by substituting, in a chemist's vat, three
naturally-occurring hydroxyl groups (which are attached to sucrose's ring
structure that is composed of carbon atoms) with three chlorine atoms. This
synthetic process makes the new molecule an intensely sweet-tasting, albeit
toxic substance that has never been proven to be safe at any dose or with
chronic use. Any yet the FDA approved it.

 

Dr. Betty Martini, a researcher from Duluth, Georgia (www.dorway.com
<http://www.dorway.com/> ) says: "the controversy rages over Splenda. Is it
safe and natural like sugar or is it a chlorinated hydrocarbon? As lawsuits
fly, consider the chemistry of this artificial compound."

"The FDA denied approval of aspartame for 16 years, then caved in to
political/economic pressure when Don Rumsfeld, CEO of the manufacturer, was
brought to Washington by Ronald Reagan (who was rumored to be a NutraSweet
addict which is important because dementia is a recognized adverse effect of
NutraSweet). A new FDA Commissioner was appointed to approve aspartame as a
food additive and then later became a consultant for NutraSweet's public
relations firm for $1,000/day on a 10-year contract. Forthcoming has been a
global epidemic of disability and death. One might expect the FDA to be more
cautious next time, yet it approved the toxic chlorocarbon Splenda without
hesitation and without any long term testing on human subjects."

 


Other poisonous chlorocarbons


 

There are so many chlorocarbon molecules that have been let loose in the
environment by the chemistry industry, that it is impossible to list them
all. 

 

Some of the common ones include the liver-destroying carbon tetrachloride;
the deadly insecticides chlordane, DDT, Lindane and many others; the
multitude of carcinogenic herbicides, including 2,4D and dioxin (Agent
Orange, of Vietnam war infamy, is still causing fetal deaths and anomalies
among the Vietnamese and death, cancer and diabetes in the exposed US
soldiers 40 years later). Most people are aware of toxic PCBs
(polychlorinated biphenyls); the ozone-destroying CFCs
(chlorofluorocarbons); the toxic polyvinyl chloride (PVC);
hexachlorobenzene; the toxic and now-banned germicide hexachlorophene;
laundry bleach; and many other carcinogenic herbicides and pesticides.
Certain cellular toxins used as chemotherapeutic agents and a host of other
lethal substances, carcinogens and even some pharmaceutical drugs (used of
course, in sub-lethal doses) are chlorocarbons. There are no totally safe
chlorocarbon molecules.

 

Chlorine gas is not a naturally-occurring substance in nature. It can only
be produced through electrolysis, by running an electrical current through a
saturated solution of sodium chloride (table salt). That process produces
deadly chlorine gas that then, when it comes in contact with any organic
compound in nature (all of which contain carbon, oxygen and hydrogen atoms)
rapidly combines with the carbon molecules to form nasty compounds, many of
which are carcinogens, mutagens and/or neurotoxins. 

 


Blowback


 

Chlorine gas as a lethal weapon of mass destruction was developed by
military scientists in World War I and then quickly banned. The gas was
extremely tricky to use, because of its dependence on the fickle winds (the
Germans needed easterly winds and the Allies needed westerly ones), which
sometimes switched-back dramatically into a "friendly fire" reality.
Parenthetically, this "blowback" reality with the poison gas might have been
the origin for the CIA term for "disastrous unintended consequences" in the
spy and war game universe.

 

Chlorine gas and volatile chlorocarbons contaminated the St. Louis River
valley's air for decades until stricter regulations changed the Cloquet, MN
(upstream-from-Duluth) paper mill's operations. Emissions from the paper
mill's bleaching operations at that plant resulted in many smelly and
unpleasantly memorable air quality problems when I was a medical intern in
Duluth 40 years ago. At that time the mill, in addition to fouling the air,
was also discharging effluent directly into the St. Louis River, with
unprovable-in-a-court-of law toxic effects to the fish, waterfowl and those
of us who drank the water that emptied into Lake Superior, Duluth's drinking
water source. Certainly there were human carcinogenic and immune-deficiency
consequences that have never been, and will never be, proven.

The science of poisonous chlorocarbon molecules

 

Chlorocarbon molecules, including sucralose, are not nutritive; hence the
claim that they have "zero calories". Such molecules, however, adversely
affect human cellular metabolism because they are toxic to various enzyme
systems and the body's mitochondria (the sub-cellular "hearts and lungs" of
our cells that, when they sicken or die off, will cause the cell to also
sicken or die). 

 

Sucrose is the sugar molecule that the digestive system breaks down into two
molecules of glucose. It cannot be broken down in the blood stream. Glucose
enters the cells from the capillaries and is used by all cells, especially
the brain, as fuel. The brain depends on continuous supplies of glucose as
its major fuel and will die if deprived of the substance for even 5 minutes.
Brain cells are almost as dependent on glucose as they are on oxygen. 

 

Sucralose, however, does not metabolize into glucose. Thus the
sucralose-contaminated person needs to obtain its life-giving glucose from
other sources. And yet the pancreas is fooled into sensing that sucralose is
glucose and pumps out insulin, which drives the glucose in the blood into
cells. The body then senses hypoglycemia (low glucose) which produces
hunger, which is then appeased by the desire to eat, especially
carbohydrates. I have known many people, especially patients of mine, who
ate a lot of carbohydrate foods along with their hunger-inducing diet soda.
This goes a long way in explaining why most people who use diet sodas
actually gain weight. 

 

Testimony from a victim of synthetic sweeteners

 

I conclude this Duty to Warn essay with an extended quote from Dr. James
Bowen (http://www.wnho.net), himself a victim of Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS -
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) because of NutraSweet neurotoxicity: Dr.
Bowen believes ingested chlorocarbon damage continues with the formation of
other toxins. 

 

"Any chlorocarbons not directly excreted from the body intact can cause
immense damage to the processes of human metabolism and, eventually, our
internal organs. The liver is a detoxification organ that deals with
ingested poisons. Chlorocarbons damage the hepatocytes, the liver's
metabolic cells, and destroy them. In test animals Splenda produced swollen
livers, as do all chlorocarbon poisons, and also calcified the kidneys of
test animals in toxicity studies. The brain and nervous system are highly
subject to metabolic toxicities and solvency damages by these chemicals.
Their high solvency attacks the human nervous system and many other body
systems including genetics and the immune function. Thus, chlorocarbon
poisoning can cause cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction.
These are well known effects of Dioxin and PCBs which are known deadly
chlorocarbons."

Dr. Bowen continues: "Just like aspartame (NutraSweet), which achieved
marketplace approval by the Food and Drug Administration when animal studies
clearly demonstrated its toxicity, sucralose also failed in clinical trials
with animals. Aspartame created brain tumors in rats. Sucralose has been
found to shrink thymus glands (the biological seat of immunity) and produce
liver inflammation in rats and mice.

"In the coming months we can expect to see a river of media hype expounding
the virtues of Splenda/sucralose. We should not be fooled again into
accepting the safety of a toxic chemical on the blessing of the FDA and
saturation advertising. In terms of potential long-term human toxicity we
should regard sucralose with its chemical cousin DDT, the insecticide now
outlawed because of its horrendous long term toxicities at even minute trace
levels in human, avian, and mammalian tissues.

"Synthetic chemical sweeteners are generally unsafe for human consumption.
This toxin was given the chemical name "sucralose" which is a play on the
technical name of natural sugar, sucrose. One is not the other. One is food,
the other is toxic; don't be deceived."




 

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to