From: 
Subject: RE: Flashback Hidden Holocaust: The Opium Wars by England Against
China

 

Hidden Holocausts: The Opium War --
-http://www.fiba-filmbank.org/dev/fiba_2003/opium_wr/fiba_04_opium_war.html
<javascript:ol('http://www.fiba-filmbank.org/dev/fiba_2003/opium_wr/fiba_04_
opium_war.html');> 

Today’s hidden Holocaust is the war against Arabs and Muslims.

The Opium War, also called the Anglo-Chinese War, was the most humiliating
defeat China ever suffered. In European history, it is perhaps the most
sordid, base, and vicious event in European history, possibly, just
possibly, overshadowed by the excesses of the Third Reich and Lenin/Stalin
and The Allies in the twentieth century. By the 1830's, the English had
become the major drug-trafficking (in addition to slave trading) criminal
organization in the world; very few drug cartels of the twentieth century
can even touch the England of the early nineteenth century in sheer size of
criminality. One wonders what is going on today in Afghanistan, another
opium war?

**********

The British wanted Emperor Tao Kwong to legalize opium and collect a tariff,
but he replied, 

"It is true I can not prevent the introduction of the flowing poison;
gain-seeking and corrupt men will for profit and sensuality defeat my
wishes, but nothing will induce me to derive a revenue from the vice and
misery of my people." According to Boothe, three of the Emperor's sons
became addicts and the drug killed each one.

Queen Victoria: The Opium Queen   -- read on...
http://www.the7thfire.com/Victoria/DrugTrade.html
<javascript:ol('http://www.the7thfire.com/Victoria/DrugTrade.html');> 

****

 

"Justice, in my opinion is with them; and whilst they, the Pagans, the
semi-civilized barbarians, have it on their side, we, the enlightened and
civilized Christians, are pursuing objects at variance both with justice and
with religion...a war more unjust in its origin, a war calculated in its
progress to cover this country with a permanent disgrace, I do not know and
I have not read of." said William Gladstone, then a member of the Tory
opposition -- regarding the Opium Wars on China
http://www.pekingduck.org/archives/003057.php
<javascript:ol('http://www.pekingduck.org/archives/003057.php');> 

 

Note the statement by a British MP:  "Pagans, semi-civilized barbarians".
Such a statement is actually a Freudian self-projection by the
self-proclaimed "enlightened and civilized British"!

  

************

 

"There is not in the history of any country, nor in criminal annals anywhere
a record of crimes so shameful, so callous, so vile as England's opium war
or England's present opium trade, or the rape of the Boer Republics, of the
crimes in India and in Persia and in Ireland and in Egypt, of Amritsar and
of Congo." O'Connell Fenian --   an Irish-American attorney and director of
the American Friends of Irish Freedom

http://gothamimage.blogspot.com/2005_08_28_gothamimage_archive.html
<javascript:ol('http://gothamimage.blogspot.com/2005_08_28_gothamimage_archi
ve.html');> 

 

********

"These crimes against humanity were the real foundation of the British
Empire. For the Chinese, the Opium Wars of 1840 and again in 1856 were
catastrophic. This 2000 year old civilisation, remarkable for its rich
culture and relative equanimity, was unable to match the military technology
of its oppressor, a warring nation that had, in contrast, acquired an empire
overnight, as a result of its ruthlessness, exploitation and conquest...."

-----------------------------

By the 1830's, the English had become the major drug-trafficking criminal
organization in the world; very few drug cartels of the twentieth century
can even touch the England of the early nineteenth century in sheer size of
criminality. Growing opium in India, the East India Company shipped tons of
opium into Canton which it traded for Chinese manufactured goods and for
tea. This trade had produced, quite literally, a country filled with drug
addicts, as opium parlors proliferated all throughout China in the early
part of the nineteenth century. This trafficking, it should be stressed, was
a criminal activity after 1836, but the British traders generously bribed
Canton officials in order to keep the opium traffic flowing. The effects on
Chinese society were devastating. In fact, there are few periods in Chinese
history that approach the early nineteenth century in terms of pure human
misery and tragedy. In an effort to stem the tragedy, the imperial
government made opium illegal in 1836 and began to aggressively close down
the opium dens. 


Lin Tse-hsü


The key player in the prelude to war was a brilliant and highly moral
official named Lin Tse-hsü. Deeply concerned about the opium menace, he
maneuvered himself into being appointed Imperial Commissioner at Canton. His
express purpose was to cut off the opium trade at its source by rooting out
corrupt officials and cracking down on British trade in the drug.

 
He took over in March of 1839 and within two months, absolutely invulnerable
to bribery and corruption, he had taken action against Chinese merchants and
Western traders and shut down all the traffic in opium. He destroyed all the
existing stores of opium and, victorious in his war against opium, he
composed a letter to Queen Victoria of England requesting that the British
cease all opium trade. His letter included the argument that, since Britain
had made opium trade and consumption illegal in England because of its
harmful effects, it should not export that harm to other countries. Trade,
according to Lin, should only be in beneficial objects. 


To be fair to England, if the only issue on the table were opium, the
English probably (just probably) would have acceded to Lin's request. The
British, however, had been nursing several grievances against China, and
Lin's take-no-prisoners enforcement of Chinese laws combined to outrage the
British against his decapitation of the opium trade. The most serious bone
of contention involved treaty relations; because the British refused to
submit to the emperor, there were no formal treaty relations between the two
countries. The most serious problem precipitated by this lack of treaty
relations involved the relationship between foreigners and Chinese law. The
British, on principle, refused to hand over British citizens to a Chinese
legal system that they felt was vicious and barbaric. The Chinese, equally
principled, demanded that all foreigners who were accused of committing
crimes on Chinese soil were to be dealt with solely by Chinese officials. In
addition to enforcing the opium laws, Lin aggressively pursued foreign
nationals accused of crimes and rightly so. 


The English, despite Lin's eloquent letter, refused to back down from the
opium trade. In response, Lin threatened to cut off all trade with England
and expel all English from China. Thus began the Opium War. 


The War


War broke out when Chinese junks attempted to turn back English merchant
vessels in November of 1839; although this was a low-level conflict, it
inspired the English to send warships in June of 1840. The Chinese, with
old-style weapons and artillery, were no match for the British gunships,
which ranged up and down the coast shooting at forts and fighting on land.
The Chinese were equally unprepared for the technological superiority of the
British land armies, and suffered continual defeats. Finally, in 1842, the
Chinese were forced to agree to an ignomious peace under the Treaty of
Nanking.

 
The treaty imposed on the Chinese was weighted entirely to the British side.
Its first and fundamental demand was for British "extraterritoriality"; all
British citizens would be subjected to British, not Chinese, law if they
committed any crime on Chinese soil. The British would no longer have to pay
tribute to the imperial administration in order to trade with China, and
they gained five open ports for British trade: Canton, Shanghai, Foochow,
Ningpo, and Amoy. No restrictions were placed on British trade, and, as a
consequence, opium trade more than doubled in the three decades following
the Treaty of Nanking. The treaty also established England as the "most
favored nation" trading with China; this clause granted to Britain any
trading rights granted to other countries. Two years later, China, against
its will, signed similar treaties with France and the United States.

 
Lin Tse-hsü was officially disgraced for his actions in Canton and was sent
to a remote appointment in Turkestan. Of all the imperial officials,
however, Lin was the first to realize the momentuous lesson of the Opium
War. In a series of letters he began to agitate the imperial government to
adopt Western technology, arms, and methods of warfare. He was first to see
that the war was about technological superiority; his influence, however,
had dwindled to nothing, so his admonitions fell on deaf ears. 


It wasn't until a second conflict with England that Chinese officials began
to take seriously the adoption of Western technologies. Even with the Treaty
of Nanking, trade in Canton and other ports remained fairly restricted; the
British were incensed by what they felt was clear treaty violations. The
Chinese, for their part, were angered at the wholescale export of Chinese
nationals to America and the Caribbean to work at what was no better than
slave labor. These conflicts came to a head in 1856 in a series of
skirmishes that ended in 1860. A second set of treaties further humiliated
and weakened the imperial government. The most ignominious of the provisions
in these treaties was the complete legalization of opium and the humiliating
provision that allowed for the free and unrestricted propagation of
Christianity in all regions of China. 


The Illustrated Gazatteer of Maritime Countries


China's defeat at the hands of England led to the publication of the
Illustrated Gazatteer of Maritime Countries by Wei Yüan (1794-1856). The
Gazatteer marks the first landmark event in the modernization of China. Wei
Yüan, a distinguished but minor official, argued in the Gazatteer that the
Europeans had developed technologies and methods of warfare in their
ceaseless and barbaric quest for power, profit, and material wealth.
Civilization, represented by China, was in danger of falling to the
technological superiority of the Western powers. Because China is a peaceful
and civilized nation, it can overcome the West only if it learns and matches
the technology and techniques of the West. The purpose of the Gazatteer was
to disseminate knowledge about the Europeans, their technologies, their
methods of warfare, and their selfish anarchy to learned officials. It is a
landmark event in Chinese history, for it was the first systematic attempt
to educate the Chinese in Western technologies and culture. This drive for
modernization, begun by Lin Tse-hsü and perpetuated by Wei Yüan would gain
momentum and emerge as the basis for the "Self-Strengthening" from 1874 to
1895. 


http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM
<javascript:ol('http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM');> 

 

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to