http://911review.org/Media/towers_controlled_demolition_9-11.html 

 


911review.org <http://www.911review.org>  Homepage


 

  _____  

As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (st911.org), I would observe that


our members have established more than a dozen disproofs of the official


government account, the truth of any one of which is enough to show that


the government's account cannot possibly be correct. Here is an overview:








(1) the impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the


buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as
Frank


DeMartini, the project manager, has observed), the planes that hit were very


similar to those they were designed to withstand, they continued to stand
after


the impact with negligible effects;








(2) the melting point of steel at 2,800*F is about 1,000*F higher than the


maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed
1,800*F


under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt,


which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down;








(3) UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for at least six
hours


before it would even significantly weaken, where these fires burned too low
and


too briefly--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the


North--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt;








(4) if the steel had melted or weakened, the buildings would have displayed


completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting,
which


would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt, and total
demolition


that was observed;








(5) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to
bring


about the collapse of the next lower floor, even if the impact of the planes
and


the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken, which means


that, even if one floor had collapsed due to the impacts and the fires, that


could not have caused lower floors to fall;








(6) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to
bring


about the pulverization of the next floor, even if the impact of the planes
and


the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken and one floor
to


collapse upon another, which required a massive source of energy beyond any
that


the government has considered;








(7) the destruction of the South Tower in 10 seconds and of the North in 11
is


even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken
12


seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphaized, is an astounding result that
would


have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives;








(8) the towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground,
where


the floors do not move, a phenomenon that Judy Wood has likened to two
gigantic


trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of
the


concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain;








(9) pools of molten metal were found at the subbasement levels three, four,
and


five weeks later, an effect that could not have been produced by the


plane-impact/jet-fuel-fire/pancake collapse scenario, which, of course,
implies


that it was not produced by such a cause;








(10) WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM/ET after


Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to "pull it",


displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions,
including


a complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own footprint, where the
floors


are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to
the


official account that it is not even mentioned in THE 9/11 COMMISSION
REPORT;








(11) the hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton


airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the


ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no
wings,


no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means that the


building was not hit by a Boeing 757!








(12) the Pentagon's own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the


building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when it was shown on "The Factor";
but


if a 155-foot long Boeing 757 had hit the building, it should have been
present


and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a
Boeing 757!








(13) the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official
trajectory--flying


at high speed barely above ground level--physically impossible; and if it
had


come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but
there


is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the
building


was not hit by a Boeing 757!








(14) if Flight 93 had come down as advertised, then there would have been a


debris field of about a city block in size, but in fact the debris is


distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be
explainable


if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed as
requird


by the government's official scenario.








There are more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they
were


not competent to fly the planes; their names were not on any passenger
manifest;


they were not subject to any autopsy; several have turned up alive and well;
the


cell calls were impossible; on and on. The evidence may be found at
st911.org.








James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.


Founder and Co-Chair


Scholars for 9/11 Truth





[email protected]





http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/ <http://www.d.umn.edu/%7Ejfetzer/> 











  _____  




Links...

Scholars for 9/11 <http://911review.org/ScholarsforTruthabout911/>  Truth


 
<http://911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/Hufschmid/WtcFireball
s.html> World Trade Center Fireballs 9/11

World
<http://911review.org/Storage/Http/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC7-shor
t.htm>  trade center building seven demolition video - September 11 attacks

Building 7 Collapse <http://911review.org/Wiki/Building7Collapse.shtml>  WTC
- 9/11 Review

Flight 77 - 9/11 Review <http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Flight77.shtml> 

Nerdcities/Guardian
<http://www.911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/index.html>  -
articles and videos - 911review

Guardian <http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Guardian.shtml> 

Stranger <http://guardian.911review.org/STF/stranger-than-fiction.htm>  Than
Fiction (Part2)- September 11 and the Zionists

Pentagon
<http://www.911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/Pentagon/what-hit
-it.htm>  American Airlines Flight  77 - September 11

Nerdcities/Guardian - articles and <http://guardian.911review.org/>  videos
- 911review

Detailed
<http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/pentagon/explosion.ht
m>  Analysis whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -EXPLOSION AT THE
PENTAGON

Video
<http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/tower-explosions.
htm>  Evidence of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses 9-11

Chapter
<http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/WTC_ch5.htm>  5 -
WTC Seven - The WTC Report. Tower 7 9/11
 
<http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/september-eleven/cell
-phones.htm> 
'Project Achilles' cell phone experiment on aircraft 911review

guardian <http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/>  video
archives 911review

Political Art - Gunpoint Democracy Iraq War <http://art.911review.org/> 

Pentagon Attack <http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Flight77Sites.shtml>  Debris
9/11 review

 <http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Flight77TowerConversations.shtml> Flight 77
Tower Conversations

Flight 77 Sites - <http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Flight77Sites.shtml>  9-11
Review

 <http://911review.org/Media/Constitution_paper.html> Constitution - Just a
Goddamned Piece of Paper says President

 <http://www.911review.org/Wget/www.whatreallyhappened.com/enemy.html> THE
ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES

 <http://911index.batcave.net> Brads 9-11 batcave

9/11 Wiki <http://911review.org/Wiki/index.html>  










Flights 11,175,77, and 93





by David Ray Griffin





The 9/11 Commission's Incredible Tales:
<http://911review.org/Wget/www.globalresearch.ca/Griffin_911_Commission_Incr
edible_Tales.html> 








 <http://911review.org/news/Professor_reynolds_tower_collpase_why.html> 





9/11 Commission Story Absurd Professor





Emeritus, Morgan Reynolds Ph.D.

sept 11 truth <http://911review.org/brad.com/sept11_truth/9_11_facts.html>
9 11 facts -

 <http://911review.org/brad.com/sept11_truth/9_11_facts.html> Simplifying
the case against Dick Cheney 

 <http://911review.org/brad.com/sept11_truth/9_11_facts.html> 9/11 Myth
Website

  _____  


911review.org <http://www.911review.org>  Homepage


 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to