-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian Henshall Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 2:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Danish PM: I had 911 tip-off; Private Commons Meeting Nov 2
FROM REINVESTIGATE 911 www.reinvestigate911.org To be removed from this occasional newsletter send a blank email to [email protected] Please address comments or offers of help to [email protected] 1. PUBLIC, PARLIAMENTARY MEETINGS ON NOVEMBER 2 First call... contact your MP... more news next week 2. DANISH PM: "I HAD TIP-OFF TWIN TOWERS WOULD COLLAPSE" No expert predicted the Towers would fall, and it took Bush's scientists years to find an explanation. So who told Rasmussen and how did they know? 1. PUBLIC, PARLIAMENTARY MEETINGS ON MONDAY NOVEMBER 2 Reinvestigate 911 has organised two meetings for Monday November 2. All MPs and Peers have been invited to a private meeting at 5.30 in a committee room in the House of Commons. The meeting takes place under Chatham House rules so that no-one can be quoted without permission. It has attracted a great deal of interest from members who normally find little time for matters outside their constituency duties and rarely come to meetings held by campaigners. A public meeting will be held at 7.30 pm in the School of Oriental and African Studies (near Russell Square tube in Central London, provisionally room B111) in the evening with the same experts who will be addressing MPs. The day's events will be advertised with a large ad in a national newspaper. For full details, please look out for our email next week. PLEASE CALL YOUR MP as a a constituent to draw their attention to the invitation to the private meeting. It is quick, it is easy and it could make a big difference. They have received it in the Commons mail. Phone the House of Commons on 0207 219 3000 and ask to be put through or better still ask for a meeting. Please remember that for people like this the idea that the 9/11 official story may be false is hard to accept. We advise you not to try to argue with them, just let us know their reaction, particularly if they are at all sympathetic, by email to [email protected]. We will send a free copy of 911 The New Evidence to any MP or assistant promising to read it. 2. DANISH PM: "I HAD TIP-OFF TWIN TOWERS WOULD COLLAPSE" Poul Rasmussen, Prime Minister of Denmark on September 11 2001, has told TV viewers he was personally tipped off that the first of the Twin Towers was going to collapse some ten minutes before the event. To those without curiosity over the events of 9/11 this may not seem significant, after all the media tell us experts have proved scientifically that the Towers were always going to collapse. But US government scientists took more than two years to come up with an explanation for the spectacular collapse of the Twin Towers, and another two years to explain the free fall collapse of WTC7 (which had not been hit by a plane) later in the day. Who figured out the building would collapse some thirty minutes after the South Tower was hit by a plane and ten minutes before the collapse happened? Apparently not any architect or engineer. In an extensive investigation The New Yorker magazine could not find one expert who thought at the time that the Twin Towers would collapse after the plane impacts and fires. This is no surprise. The Empire State Building was hit by a plane years before the plans for the Towers were proposed, so there was a very public debate culminating in a general acceptance that the design could easily withstand one, some said several, plane impacts. And planes at the time the Towers were built were just as big, just as fast and, despite strange suggestions in the corporate media to the contrary, planners knew that a colliding plane would have fuel on board too. In fact the super fast, symmetrical and total collapses have still not been scientifically explained. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, part of the Commerce Department) report, based on secret evidence, secret computer models, never peer reviewed, and written by government scientists whose ultimate employer was President Bush, was about as scientific as the inquisition. It took several alterations to the secret computer models (according to sacked whistleblower Kevin Ryan) to get the desired answer. Even then they could not find any evidence that the fires reached the high temperatures their theory required. The report ended at the moment when the collapse began, thus failing to explain the most bizarre features of the event. The question remains: who figured out that the architecture and engineering professions would get it wrong, and phoned the Danish PM to let him know? It wasn't the firefighters: chiefs were planning to set up a station a few floors below the seat of the fires. Two firefighters had reached the fires and radioed to say they were manageable with two hoses. One was the Fire Department's terrorism expert who had made a study of the structure of the Towers. Fire chiefs told the media that a total collapse was "the farthest thing from our minds". Some 9/11 sceptics have an explanation: it was whoever recabled the Towers in the weeks before 9/11, and encouraged Mayor Giulliani's team to leave their emergency management centre in WTC7 which collapsed later in the day. The team were part of Dick Cheney's anti-terrorism exercise which involved a fake hijacking and a disaster in New York. A smoking gun, say sceptics, a simple coincidence, say the corporate media. If experts and the media had blown the whistle on the controlled demolitions, say sceptics, it would have been presented as a desperate act of necessity to make sure the buildings came down in their own footprint, minimising the damage. But this would be the fallback position, or limited hangout in CIA jargon. To keep the story simple, and avoid public suspicions and expensive lawsuits, top politicians and the media were told in advance to expect a spontaneous collapse, say sceptics. This is clearly a case for the BBC's Conspiracy Files. But the BBC had a tip-off too. Recently a video surfaced of a BBC reporter announcing that the third building that day, WTC7, had already collapsed while viewers could plainly see it still intact in the background behind the reporter (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s&feature=related> &feature=related ) So how will the BBC Conspiracy Files react to the news? Will they go back to their sources, ask Rasmussen where the tip-off came from or perhaps ask 10 Downing Street if they had a tip-off too? Unlikely. "Due impariality" though an obligation incorporated by law into the BBC's royal charter, in practice extends to giving a platform to nazis but not to 9/11 sceptics. The BBC are ultimately paid by the UK government, so they will probably choose to stand shoulder to shoulder with the scientists at NIST, paid by the White House, and wait for the next official report. This might take several more years, especially if NIST are called on to explain the droplets of molten iron and traces of nano-thermite (an explosive/incendiary agent used in controlled demolitions) recently found in samples of WTC dust by independent experts. In the meanwhile, since 9/11, there's always a war somewhere to report on. _______________________________________________ [email protected] *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr or http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to [email protected] ; free book download: http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
