remember the British Lord/US Elite's Opium Wars in the past against China
where they terrorized China into accepting their Opium that was grown in
Afghanistan to be sold in China. This is just a continuation...US/UK/NATO
are again dying/killing for OPIUM PROFITS! All Afghan puppets are on CIA
payroll..at taxpayers' expense, just like the Banking Dynasties Elite with
the bailouts..

 

From: 
Subject: AFGHAN LEADER'S BROTHER SAID TO BE IN OPIUM TRADE AND ON CIA
PAYROLL-L1
Importance: High

 

http://judicial-inc.biz/Dying_for_afghan_opium.htm

 

 

SVO-10/29/09--

AFGHAN LEADER'S BROTHER SAID TO BE IN OPIUM TRADE AND ON CIA PAYROLL

The real question is, now that the explosive growth of the opium trade has
been exposed, are the international banksters and official Washington using
the NYT to throw Hamid Karzai and his brother under the bus and clear the
way for a new puppet in Kabul? The lucrative opium trade is world wide and
the flow of Dollars, Pesos, Euros and Yen require the laundry services of
international bankers who take their piece of the action.  These are the
same banksters that have a stranglehold on America's politics and media. ~
comment by Frank Fugelman, SVO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Brother of Afghan Leader Is Said to Be on C.I.A. Payroll

New York Times

Published: October 27, 2009 

 

This article is by Dexter Filkins, Mark Mazzetti and James Risen.

 

KABUL,
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/af
ghanistan/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> Afghanistan -
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/ahmed_wali_kar
zai/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan
president and a suspected player in the country's booming illegal
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/o/opium/index.
html?inline=nyt-classifier> opium trade, gets regular payments from the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/central
_intelligence_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Central Intelligence Agency,
(more American tax Money) and has for much of the past eight years,
according to current and former American officials.

The agency pays Mr. Karzai for a variety of services, including helping to
recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the C.I.A.'s direction
in and around the southern city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai's home. 

The financial ties and close working relationship between the intelligence
agency and Mr. Karzai raise significant questions about America's war
strategy, which is
<http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/obama-defends-afghanistan-tim
etable/?scp=1&sq=caucus%20afghanistan%20obama%20strategy&st=cse> currently
under review at the White House. 

The ties to Mr. Karzai have created deep divisions within the Obama
administration. The critics say the ties complicate America's increasingly
tense relationship with President
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/hamid_karzai/i
ndex.html?inline=nyt-per> Hamid Karzai, who has struggled to build sustained
popularity among Afghans and has long been portrayed by the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/t/taliban
/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Taliban as an American puppet. The C.I.A.'s
practices also suggest that the United States is not doing everything in its
power to stamp out the lucrative Afghan drug trade, a major source of
revenue for the Taliban.

More broadly, some American officials argue that the reliance on Ahmed Wali
Karzai, the most powerful figure in a large area of southern Afghanistan
where the Taliban insurgency is strongest, undermines the American push to
develop an effective central government that can maintain law and order and
eventually allow the United States to withdraw.

"If we are going to conduct a population-centric strategy in Afghanistan,
and we are perceived as backing thugs, then we are just undermining
ourselves," said Maj. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, the senior American military
intelligence official in Afghanistan.

Ahmed Wali Karzai said in an interview that he cooperated with American
civilian and military officials, but did not engage in the drug trade and
did not receive payments from the C.I.A.

The relationship between Mr. Karzai and the C.I.A. is wide ranging, several
American officials said. He helps the C.I.A. operate a paramilitary group,
the Kandahar Strike Force, that is used for raids against suspected
insurgents and terrorists. On at least one occasion, the strike force has
been accused of mounting an unauthorized operation against an official of
the Afghan government, the officials said.

Mr. Karzai is also paid for allowing the C.I.A. and American Special
Operations troops to rent a large compound outside the city - the former
home of Mullah
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/muhammad_omar/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> Mohammed Omar, the Taliban's founder. The same
compound is also the base of the Kandahar Strike Force. "He's our landlord,"
a senior American official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Mr. Karzai also helps the C.I.A. communicate with and sometimes meet with
Afghans loyal to the Taliban. Mr. Karzai's role as a go-between between the
Americans and the Taliban is now regarded as valuable by those who support
working with Mr. Karzai, as the Obama administration is placing a greater
focus on encouraging Taliban leaders to change sides. 

A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment for this article. 

"No intelligence organization worth the name would ever entertain these kind
of allegations," said Paul Gimigliano, the spokesman.

Some American officials said that the
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/05/world/asia/05afghan.html> allegations of
Mr. Karzai's role in the drug trade were not conclusive.

"There's no proof of Ahmed Wali Karzai's involvement in
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/af
ghanistan/drug_trafficking/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> drug
trafficking, certainly nothing that would stand up in court," said one
American official familiar with the intelligence. "And you can't ignore what
the Afghan government has done for American counterterrorism efforts."

At the start of the Afghan war, just after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the
United States, American officials paid warlords with questionable
backgrounds to help topple the Taliban and maintain order with relatively
few American troops committed to fight in the country. But as the Taliban
has become resurgent and the war has intensified, Americans have
increasingly viewed a strong and credible central government as crucial to
turning back the Taliban's advances.

Now, with more American lives on the line, the relationship with Mr. Karzai
is setting off anger and frustration among American military officers and
other officials in the Obama administration. They say that Mr. Karzai's
suspected role in the drug trade, as well as what they describe as the
mafialike way that he lords over southern Afghanistan, makes him a
malevolent force.

These military and political officials say the evidence, though largely
circumstantial, suggests strongly that Mr. Karzai has enriched himself by
helping the illegal trade in poppy and opium to flourish. The assessment of
these military and senior officials in the Obama administration dovetails
with that of senior officials in the Bush administration.

"Hundreds of millions of dollars in drug money are flowing through the
southern region, and nothing happens in southern Afghanistan without the
regional leadership knowing about it," a senior American military officer in
Kabul said. Like most of the officials in this article, he spoke on the
condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the information.

"If it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck,"
the American officer said of Mr. Karzai. "Our assumption is that he's
benefiting from the drug trade."

American officials say that Afghanistan's opium trade, the largest in the
world, directly threatens the stability of the Afghan state, by providing a
large percentage of the money the Taliban needs for its operations, and also
by corrupting Afghan public officials to help the trade flourish.

The Obama administration has repeatedly vowed to crack down on the drug
lords who are believed to permeate the highest levels of President Karzai's
administration. They have pressed him to move his brother out of southern
Afghanistan, but he has so far refused to do so.

Other Western officials pointed to evidence that Ahmed Wali Karzai
orchestrated the manufacture of hundreds of thousands of phony ballots for
his brother's re-election effort in August. He is also believed to have been
responsible for setting up dozens of so-called ghost polling stations -
existing only on paper - that were used to manufacture tens of thousands of
phony ballots.

"The only way to clean up Chicago is to get rid of Capone," General Flynn
said. 

In the interview in which he denied a role in the drug trade or taking money
from the C.I.A., Ahmed Wali Karzai said he received regular payments from
his brother, the president, for "expenses," but said he did not know where
the money came from. He has, among other things, introduced Americans to
insurgents considering changing sides. And he has given the Americans
intelligence, he said. But he said he was not compensated for that
assistance.

I don't know anyone under the name of the C.I.A.," Mr. Karzai said. "I have
never received any money from any organization. I help, definitely. I help
other Americans wherever I can. This is my duty as an Afghan."

Mr. Karzai acknowledged that the C.I.A. and Special Operations troops stayed
at Mullah Omar's old compound. And he acknowledged that the Kandahar Strike
Force was based there. But he said he had no involvement with them. 

A former C.I.A. officer with experience in Afghanistan said the agency
relied heavily on Ahmed Wali Karzai, and often based covert operatives at
compounds he owned. Any connections Mr. Karzai might have had to the drug
trade mattered little to C.I.A. officers focused on counterterrorism
missions, the officer said.

"Virtually every significant Afghan figure has had brushes with the drug
trade," he said. "If you are looking for
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/teresa_mother/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> Mother Teresa, she doesn't live in Afghanistan."

The debate over Ahmed Wali Karzai, which began when
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/i
ndex.html?inline=nyt-per> President Obama took office in January,
intensified in June, when the C.I.A.'s local paramilitary group, the
Kandahar Strike Force, shot and killed Kandahar's provincial police chief,
Matiullah Qati, in
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/world/asia/30afghan.html>  a
still-unexplained shootout at the office of a local prosecutor. 

The circumstances surrounding Mr. Qati's death remain shrouded in mystery.
It is unclear, for instance, if any agency operatives were present - but
officials say the firefight broke out when Mr. Qati tried to block the
strike force from freeing the brother of a task force member who was being
held in custody.

"Matiullah was in the wrong place at the wrong time," Mr. Karzai said in the
interview.

Counternarcotics officials have repeatedly expressed frustration over the
unwillingness of senior policy makers in Washington to take action against
Mr. Karzai - or even begin a serious investigation of the allegations
against him. In fact, they say that while other Afghans accused of drug
involvement are investigated and singled out for raids or even rendition to
the United States, Mr. Karzai has seemed immune from similar scrutiny. 

For years, first the Bush administration and then the Obama administration
have said that the Taliban benefits from the drug trade, and the United
States military has recently expanded its target list to include drug
traffickers with ties to the insurgency. The military has generated a list
of 50 top drug traffickers tied to the Taliban who can now be killed or
captured. 

Senior Afghan investigators say they know plenty about Mr. Karzai's
involvement in the drug business. In an interview in Kabul this year, a top
former Afghan Interior Ministry official familiar with Afghan
counternarcotics operations said that a major source of Mr. Karzai's
influence over the drug trade was his control over key bridges crossing the
Helmand River on the route between the opium growing regions of Helmand
Province and Kandahar.

The former Interior Ministry official said that Mr. Karzai was able to
charge huge fees to drug traffickers to allow their drug-laden trucks to
cross the bridges. 

But the former officials said it was impossible for Afghan counternarcotics
officials to investigate Mr. Karzai. "This government has become a factory
for the production of Talibs because of corruption and injustice," the
former official said.

Some American counternarcotics officials have said they believe that Mr.
Karzai has expanded his influence over the drug trade, thanks in part to
American efforts to single out other drug lords. 

In debriefing notes from
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/d/drug_en
forcement_administration/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Drug Enforcement
Administration interviews in 2006 of Afghan informants obtained by The New
York Times, one key informant said that Ahmed Wali Karzai had benefited from
the American operation that lured Hajji Bashir Noorzai, a major Afghan drug
lord during the time that the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, to New York in
2005. Mr. Noorzai was convicted on drug and conspiracy charges in New York
in 2008, and was sentenced to life in prison this year. 

Habibullah Jan, a local military commander and later a member of parliament
from Kandahar, told the D.E.A. in 2006 that Mr. Karzai had teamed with Haji
Juma Khan to take over a portion of the Noorzai drug business after Mr.
Noorzai's arrest. 

Dexter Filkins reported from Kabul, and Mark Mazzetti and James Risen from
Washington. Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Washington.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/asia/28intel.html?_r=1
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/asia/28intel.html?_r=1&partner=rss&;
emc=rss&src=igw> &partner=rss&emc=rss&src=igw

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 

 

  _____  


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to