Webmaster's Commentary: 

Translation: They were hoping to provoke Iran into a reckless action and
didn't want the dumb American sheeple to know the US started it.


U.S. Freezes $2
<http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB126057864707988237-lMyQjAxMDI5NjEwMTU
xNzE4Wj.html>  Billion in Iran Case 


http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB126057864707988237-lMyQjAxMDI5NjEwMTUx
NzE4Wj.html

Tags: IRAN <http://whatreallyhappened.com/taxonomy/term/83> 

More than $2 billion allegedly held on behalf of Iran in Citigroup Inc.
accounts were secretly ordered frozen last year by a federal court in
Manhattan, in what appears to be the biggest seizure of Iranian assets
abroad since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

The legal order, executed 18 months ago by the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York, is under seal and hasn't been made public.

President Barack Obama has pledged to enact new economic sanctions on Iran
at year-end if Tehran doesn't respond to international calls for
negotiations over its nuclear-fuel program.

The frozen $2 billion stands at the center of an intensifying legal struggle
between Luxembourg's Clearstream Banking S.A., the holder of the Citibank
account, and the families of hundreds of U.S. Marines killed or injured in a
1983 terrorist attack on a Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.

Clearstream is primarily a clearing house for financial trades and is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Boerse AG. Luxembourg's bank
secrecy laws have helped it grow into a major European financial center.

There is no indication that Citibank knew the funds may ultimately belong to
Iran. U.S. firms that do business with Iran face stiff civil and criminal
penalties.

A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2003 that Iran orchestrated the
bombing of the Marine barracks and later ordered Tehran to pay the victims'
families $2.7 billion in compensation.

Lawyers for the families, backed by information provided by the U.S.
Treasury, are arguing that Clearstream is holding Iranian funds at Citibank
and are seeking to seize the assets as payment for their clients.

"I was stunned when this money popped up in New York," said Steven Perles, a
lawyer representing the victims' families. "I had no idea there was Iranian
money of this size flowing through the United States."

Citibank, Clearstream and the Iranian government all declined to comment on
the case, and Tehran hasn't made any filings in the matter. The outlines of
the dispute, however, appear in judicial filings and in the federal court's
docket sheets.

Those documents show that Clearstream has denied it is holding funds for the
Iranian government and that the European firm has been fighting to release
the $2 billion.

The court initially ordered Citibank in June 2008 to freeze $2.25 billion of
Clearstream's accounts, but the company's lawyers were able to get $250
million released the following month, according to court records.
Clearstream is represented in the U.S. by White & Case LLP, which declined
to comment.

The legal battle over the funds could lead to a trial. A victory for the
plaintiffs would mark the largest seizure of Iranian funds since Islamist
parties seized power in Tehran from the U.S.-backed Shah in 1979.

That year, the U.S. government froze around $12 billion of Iranian assets in
retaliation for the kidnapping of American diplomats and military personnel.
While a portion of the funds was returned after the hostages' release, a
United Nations body in the Netherlands continues to try and arbitrate the
return of the remaining assets, which include bank deposits, gold and real
estate.

The legal case concerning Citibank in New York comes as the U.S. government
is intensifying efforts to use the global financial system to pressure Iran
into giving up its nuclear program and support for international terrorism.

U.S. officials said that the Obama administration has also finished
tailoring a new round of economic sanctions on Iran that could be enacted
early next year.

The new penalties seek to hobble Tehran's oil and gas industry by
blacklisting Iranian energy, insurance and shipping firms.

The U.S. strategy also seeks to target the economic assets of Iran's elite
military unit, the Revolutionary Guards Corps, which is believed to oversee
the country's nuclear program. U.S. officials said international
deliberations over new Iran sanctions could begin at the United Nations
Security Council within the next month.

"Inside the U.S. government, the plan is now done," said a senior U.S.
official briefed on the sanctions deliberations. "We've put together a plan
that's comprehensive and goes after a number of Iran's vulnerabilities."

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates joined with European leaders Friday to
warn that Iran risks sanctions soon if it fails to cooperate with the West
on its expanding nuclear program.

"I think that you are going to see some significant additional sanctions
imposed by the international community," Mr. Gates said. He cautioned that
"any military action would only buy some time, maybe two or three years."

Lawyers for the victims of the Beirut bombing said they started looking for
Iranian assets to seize after winning the $2.7 billion judgment in 2007. A
federal judge in Washington D.C. ruled that Iran's intelligence service, the
Ministry of Information and Security, directly oversaw the bombing of the
Marine Corps barracks in coordination with the Lebanese militant group,
Hezbollah. Before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, it was the largest terrorist
attack ever inflicted on U.S. citizens; 241 servicemen died.

The lawyers initially looked at targeting assets of global oil companies who
did business with Iran, as well as international organizations like the
World Bank. But last year, they also subpoenaed the Treasury Department to
gain any information that the U.S. government had on Iranian assets inside
the U.S.

In June 2008, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control filed a motion
in Washington D.C. federal court, seeking authorization to disclose to the
plaintiffs in the terrorism cases information concerning assets being held
inside the U.S. in which Iran might have an interest.

Treasury also said in its court filing that its motion needed to be
expedited due to "the risk of immediate asset flight."

Two days later, the New York court ordered Citibank to freeze $2.25 billion
of Clearstream's accounts in New York.

Write to Jay Solomon at  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 

 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences

Reply via email to