cid:[email protected] >From : <[email protected]> Sent : Monday, July 24, 2006 3:02 PM To : cid:[email protected] As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (st911.org), I would observe that our members have established more than a dozen disproofs of the official government account, the truth of any one of which is enough to show that the government's account cannot possibly be correct. Here is an overview: (1) the impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank DeMartini, the project manager, has observed), the planes that hit were very similar to those they were designed to withstand, they continued to stand after the impact with negligible effects; (2) the melting point of steel at 2,800*F is about 1,000*F higher than the maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt, which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down; (3) UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for at least six hours before it would even significantly weaken, where these fires burned too low and too briefly--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the North--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt; (4) if the steel had melted or weakened, the buildings would have displayed completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt, and total demolition that was observed; (5) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to bring about the collapse of the next lower floor, even if the impact of the planes and the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken, which means that, even if one floor had collapsed due to the impacts and the fires, that could not have caused lower floors to fall; (6) there was not enough kinetic energy for the collapse of one floor to bring about the pulverization of the next floor, even if the impact of the planes and the ensuing fires had been enough to cause the steel to weaken and one floor to collapse upon another, which required a massive source of energy beyond any that the government has considered; (7) the destruction of the South Tower in 10 seconds and of the North in 11 is even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken 12 seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphaized, is an astounding result that would have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives; (8) the towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where the floors do not move, a phenomenon that Judy Wood has likened to two gigantic trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain; (9) pools of molten metal were found at the subbasement levels three, four, and five weeks later, an effect that could not have been produced by the plane-impact/jet-fuel-fire/pancake collapse scenario, which, of course, implies that it was not produced by such a cause; (10) WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM/ET after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to "pull it", displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions, including a complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to the official account that it is not even mentioned in THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT; (11) the hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757! (12) the Pentagon's own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when it was shown on "The Factor"; but if a 155-foot long Boeing 757 had hit the building, it should have been present and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757! (13) the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory--flying at high speed barely above ground level--physically impossible; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757! (14) if Flight 93 had come down as advertised, then there would have been a debris field of about a city block in size, but in fact the debris is distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be explainable if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed as requird by the government's official scenario. There are more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they were not competent to fly the planes; their names were not on any passenger manifest; they were not subject to any autopsy; several have turned up alive and well; the cell calls were impossible; on and on. The evidence may be found at st911.org. James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. Founder and Co-Chair Scholars for 9/11 Truth [email protected] <http://by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=00000000-0000 -0000-0000-000000000001&a=da85a55f8b749ee4e248fab511a046d709bfea65d9cbb3ae1c 74f9984f774f54&mailto=1&[email protected]&msg=FCA5C453-2926-4682-B825-F75 B4C524D97&start=0&len=10183&src=&type=x> http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/ <javascript:ol('http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/');> http://scholarsfor911truth.org <javascript:ol('http://scholarsfor911truth.org');> (st911.org) Fact: Official flight logs from the US Bureau of transportation say that Flights 11 and 77 did not exist. http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html <javascript:ol('http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html');> Fact: The FAA aircraft registry shows the two planes which flew UA 93 and 175 that day as still registered for more than four years after their supposed destruction. Got to the FAA aircraft registry, do an N number search and check for yourself. Fact: The passenger lists published by the media for the mythical flight 11 are proven fakes -even without the documentation that the flight didn't exist. http://members.iinet.au/~holmgren/fake.html <javascript:ol('http://members.iinet.au/~holmgren/fake.html');> Videos of the second strike plane are blatantly fake. The video of the first strike does not show a plane. http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/noplanework.html <javascript:ol('http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/noplanework.html');> Witness evidence supports either an explosion only or else a small object of some kind. Forensic analysis shows that it's impossible for the strikes to have been caused by big planes. http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911 <javascript:ol('http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_h oles');> &subpage1=we_have_holes http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=79 <javascript:ol('http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=79');> Government apologists only response is a barrage of apoplectic name calling and continuous lies. Once people get thrashed in a debate, they deliberately misrepresent something you wrote - as John did in falsely presenting the witness report of Don Dahler - somehow managing to miss the emphasis I had written in caps. and they also pretend to know what we are thinking creating a distorted argument. *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr or <http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2> http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] ; free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
<<image001.gif>>
<<image002.gif>>
