From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Tony Gosling
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Aliens = Humans with no Empathy = Elite = Zionists = Imperialists =
Bilderbergers = Communists = Darwinists = Masons = Jesuits = ......

 

(film reference for Nafeez' latest article) 
In the John Carpenter film They Live! aliens are systematically gaining
control of the earth by masquerading as humans. 
'They' use, as cover, an organisation something like the Council on Foreign
Relations. 
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-9005367754264973286

They live
By Nafeez Ahmed
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Feb 15, 2010, 00:26
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5579.shtml

Despite his campaign promises, over a year into his presidency, Obama has
been unable to deliver the change that Americans and the world alike had
hoped for. Part of the problem is that neocon ideology is alive and well,
reaching into the corridors of the White House, and dominating the airwaves.

Indeed, back in January 2009, after Obama had just announced his
appointments, prominent neoconservative icons, intellectuals and ideologues
were virtually jumping for joy. Military historian (and McCain campaign
staffer) Max Boot
<http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot/44551> , a columnist
for the Los Angeles Times and regular contributor to the Washington Post and
New York Times, declared: "I am gobsmacked by these appointments, most of
which could just as easily have come from a President McCain." David
<http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/election/646>  Horowitz, editor of
FrontPageMag.com and a regular columnist for Salon.com, rebuked sceptical
conservative activists: "Now, as president-elect he has just formed the most
conservative foreign policy team since John F. Kennedy, one well to the
right of Bill Clinton. Where is your gratitude for that?"

And even earlier during the campaign period, Robert
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR200704270
2027.html>  Kagan, co-founder of the notorious Bush-affiliated Project for a
New American Century (PNAC) and columnist for the Washington Post and New
York Times Syndicate, hailed "Obama, the interventionist"; while staunch
Bush supporter Christopher Hitchens <http://www.slate.com/id/2202163/> , a
contributing editor at Vanity Fair, demanded that readers "Vote for Obama"
due to McCain and Palin being a collective "disgrace."

Why did so many leading neoconservative commentators, who previously
supported the Bush administration's doctrine of unilateral preemptive global
warfare, come running to Obama's doorstep?

Over the last few decades -- particularly after 9/11 -- neocons have
increasingly come to prominence in the American policymaking establishment.
Despite Bush's massive unpopularity by 2008, his administration, on the one
hand, allowed neocons to consolidate their penetration of the foreign policy
and media circuit; and, on the other, was buttressed by right-wing pundits
who exploited their media access to support even its most absurd claims.

Neocon commentators were instrumental, for instance, in promulgating the
widely
<http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2004/09/19/a_911_legacy_co
nfusion_over_a_name_czechs_find_error_in_tracking_atta/>  debunked
allegation that 9/11 chief bomber Mohamed Atta was linked to Saddam
<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20021014/hitchens>  Hussein, seized upon by
the Bush administration to justify the war on Iraq as part of the war on
al-Qaeda terrorism. As late as November 2008, 52 percent of Americans still
believed that " Saddam
<http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=972>  Hussein
had strong links to Al Qaeda" -- down from 64 per cent in 2006.

Despite such neocon myths being totally discredited, their promulgators even
now continue to get air time and print space. In November 2008, Weekly
Standard columnist Stephen
<http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1855998,00.html>  F.
Hayes -- who wrote an entire book trying to prove the non-existent Saddam
al-Qaeda link and whose official biography of Dick Cheney was described by
<http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=dicking_around> American
Prospect as "fawning," "turgid, soul-killing" and "meaningless" -- was hired
by CNN as a political contributor. Frank Gaffney
<http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2558>  -- a founding member of
PNAC and regular contributor to the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, New York
Times, among other publications, who also advocated this myth during the war
-- was able to come on MSNBC's respected Hardball show in March 2009 and
tell host Chris Matthews that the perpetrators of 9/11 "had, in fact,
collaborative relationships with Iraqi intelligence."

"They are effectively insulated from failure," observed Harvard political
scientist and neocon antagonist Stephen Walt
<http://www.newsweek.com/id/232053/output/print>  on this curious
phenomenon. "Even if you've totally screwed up in office and things you've
advocated in print have failed, there are no real consequences, either
professionally or politically. You . . . continue to agitate or appear on
talk shows as if nothing has gone wrong at all." One explanation for this
persistence is that despite serious differences, left and right of the
American political spectrum have increasingly converged on their diagnosis
of the central goal of US foreign policy: maintaining US preeminence. They
therefore also agree that the central challenge for American foreign policy
is how to do this in the face of trends of potential decline due to
geopolitical, financial, ecological and energy crises. This convergence is
illustrated in the "common cause
<http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JL04Ak01.html> " many top Obama
advisers had made with neocon "war-minded think-tank hawks."

A new study by left-wing and right-wing academics at Manchester University,
Birkbeck College and University College London's Institute for the Study of
the Americas, New Directions in US Foreign Policy, finds that "American
foreign policy has not changed course after the Bush years." On issues like
Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo, actual policies have been markedly
similar. UCL Professor Rob
<http://www.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/news/archive/list/item/?id=5043&year=20
09&month=09>  Singh, a neoconservative, points out that "when you look at
substance over style and rhetoric, you can legitimately question the extent
of change. We all agree that militarism is a crucial part of US strategy,
along with a commitment to robust free trade." No wonder Robert Kagan could
write so approvingly in the Wall Street Journal -- citing the ongoing troop
presence in Iraq, escalation in Afghanistan and Pakistan, military actions
in Yemen and Somalia, and worldwide expansion of military bases -- that "the
US under Barack Obama remains a martial
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104574652372456526440.h
tml>  nation."

It is no surprise then that neocon pundits continue to retain undeserved
influence and even credibility. As the longevity of the Saddam al-Qaeda
'meme' shows, their influence on public perceptions can be indelible, and
disastrous.

In one of the latest episodes, Christopher
<http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/02/hitchens-201002>
Hitchens lashed out at American essayist, dissident and one-time JFK
adviser, Gore Vidal, describing him as a crackpot for, among other things,
noting that bin Laden is "still not the proven mastermind" of 9/11.
Right-wing bloggers everywhere rejoiced. "Vidal is another old writer who
won't last much longer. After he croaks, Christopher Hitchens will need a
new whipping boy," said one <http://no-slappz.blogspot.com/> . "Thank you
Mr. Hitchens for skewering that crackpot," said another
<http://fconte.blogspot.com/2010/02/thank-you-mr-hitchens-for-skewering.html
> . Yet, as I pointed out in my <http://www.independent.co.uk/nafeez>
rejoinder to Hitchens in the February 7 Independent on Sunday, "it would
seem the FBI agree with Gore, not Hitchens: according to Sonoma State
University's Project Censored, one of the top 25 censored news stories of
2008 was that 'He [bin Laden] has not been formally indicted and charged in
connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin
Laden to 9/11.' Clearly, this doesn't prove bin Laden wasn't the mastermind,
but should give us pause for thought about why the evidence isn't so
forthcoming."

Indeed, Hitchens himself is not averse to "conspiracy-mongering" when it
suits. He was among the group of discredited pundits trumpeting the neocon
conspiracy theory that 9/11 chief bomber Mohamed Atta was linked to Saddam
<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20021014/hitchens>  Hussein.

Hitchens and his ilk have now set their sights on Iran. In a recent column
for Slate, Hitchens demands that the US government 'Abolish the CIA
<http://www.slate.com/id/2179593/> ' due to successive National Intelligence
Estimates failing to find evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons programme
-- in true conspiratorial fashion, 'no evidence' constitutes proof that Iran
is "lying," and that the CIA is "worse than useless -- it's a positive
menace. We need to shut the whole thing down and start again.'

Similarly, neocon icon Daniel
<http://rawstory.com/2010/02/neocon-obama-save-presidency-bombing-iran/>
Pipes early last week urged Obama to order the US military "to destroy
Iran's nuclear-weapon capacity" as a "dramatic gesture" that would "change
public perception of him as a lightweight . . . Just as 9/11 caused voters
to forget George W. Bush's meandering early months, a strike on Iranian
facilities would dispatch Obama's feckless first year down the memory hole
and transform the domestic political scene."

Does such alarmism play a political function? In early 2008, a US
Presidential Finding uncontested by Democrat members of the House affirmed
that the CIA was financing covert operations against Iran to the tune of
$300 million. Robert Gates, the architect of Bush's Iran strategy, remains
Obama's defence secretary. US national security journalist Gareth Porter has
recently confirmed from senior US and German intelligence officials that
purported evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons programme -- including the
IAEA <http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=47081> 's 'alleged studies' as well
as an alleged Iranian <http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=49833>  'neutron
initiator' document unearthed by the Times -- was forged. Former CIA
counterterrorism official Philip Giraldi told Porter that the media had
frequently published "false intelligence" on Iraq and Iran from pro-Israeli
sources.

The lesson is obvious. The continued public prevalence of neocon discourse
on foreign policy not only throws fuel on the fire; it imagines smoke when
there is no fire. But as we have learnt from the Iraq-WMD farce, now
unravelling in the Chilcot Inquiry, such alarmism is part of the problem,
not the solution.
Dr Nafeez Ahmed is Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Research &
Development (www.iprd.org.uk <http://www.iprd.org.uk/> ) in London, and
author of A Users Guide to the Crisis of Civilization (forthcoming in June
from Pluto and Palgrave Macmillan) among other books on international
security issues. He blogs at http://nafeez.blogspot.com
<http://nafeez.blogspot.com/> . 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "UK 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Network" group.
Associated with the 9/11 Forum http://www.911forum.org.uk/
 
Good news sources
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13410
 



 

 

 

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at
<http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr    or
<http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2>
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You can
also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] ; free book download:
<http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  ***
Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only.
***  NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They
may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of
this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments
to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955
Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody &
satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be
removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences

Reply via email to