From: Subject: Signs of changes in 9/11 attitudes among some media outlets outside US! Cheney, probable mastermind, needs to be subpoenaed before his heart gives out completely!
Good news for the 9/11 Truth movement faithful can be found at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17624> &aid=17624. It appears that the major media outlets around the world (perhaps not so in the US, however) are getting ready to lift the censorship on the truths of 9/11 and allow a fair discussion of this "taboo" subject and push for an independent investigation. It is worth reading and very affirming. Keep on keeping on! Below is the introduction to the article. Gary PS: We need to push for opening the investigation and subpeona Dick Cheney to testify under oath (or waterboard torture?) before he kicks the bucket and takes his knowledge of the event (probably as mastermind) with him to the grave. PPS: Be sure to also watch this definitive evidence for controlled demolition by explosive devices in the North Tower: < <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyoayCU42hM&feature=player_embedded> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyoayCU42hM&feature=player_embedded> ______________________________________________________________________ http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=17624 The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change in 2009-2010 By Elizabeth Woodworth Global Research, February 15, 2010 Abstract In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account. Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense. This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies. Eight countries - Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia - have allowed their publicly - owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11. This more open approach taken in the international media - I could also have included the Japanese media - might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks - a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re- examine the country's foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge. I. Introduction Until 2009, doubts about the official 9/11 story were briefly entertained by the mainstream media on each anniversary of the event, allowing the independent research community only a fleeting moment once a year to publicly voice its findings. But after crucial scientific evidence emerged in April 2009 to challenge the official story of how the towers fell, a spate of European media reports followed. The news coverage of thie evidence seems to have opened the door to more serious reflection on all aspects of the 9/11 issue in the major media. The first paper in my series, "The Media Response to 9/11," dealt with the New Statesman's grudging recognition of Dr. David Ray Griffin, the world's "top truther" (as it dubbed him), placing him number 41 among "The 50 People Who Matter Today."1 Since this admission in September 2009, the issue has gathered increasing momentum. The collective content issuing from this new momentum is presented here in the hope that it will embolden other major media to take up the pivotal controversy concerning 9/11, and pursuing the truth wherever it may lead. Observations on the Analysis While carrying out my analysis, I observed five new features in the media treatment of the 9/11 issue that developed as 2009 progressed. They are listed here, so that readers might look for them in the case studies that follow below: 1. The 9/11 issue is increasingly framed not as conspiracy theories versus hard science, but as a legitimate controversy resting on unanswered questions and a search for truth. 2. News reports and television programs examining these controversies have become longer and more balanced. 3. Major media outlets have begun to present the claims of the truth movement first, followed by counter -arguments from defenders of the official story. 4. Major media outlets have begun to include, and even to introduce, extensive evidence to support the claims of the 9/11 truth community. 5. The media treatments increasingly suggest the possibility of a re - investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. The first part of this essay deals with the crucial scientific evidence that emerged in early 2009, the significance of this evidence in relation to the official story of 9/11, and the immediate news coverage it received. II. Scientific Paper Finds Nano-thermite Explosives in World Trade Center Dust, April 3, 2009 A peer-reviewed paper published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3, 2009,2 reported that a little known high -tech explosive called nano- thermite was found throughout the World Trade Center dust. These physicists and chemists involved in this study discovered "distinctive red/gray chips in significant numbers"3 in four samples of dust collected from the area. The presence of aluminum and iron oxide in the red material provided one of the signs that it might be nano- thermite, which is a high explosive (whereas ordinary thermite is an incendiary.) Another clue was provided when putting a flame to the chips produced an explosive reaction. On the basis of these and other observations, the team concluded that "the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."4 The article's first -named author, Dr. Niels Harrit - a University of Copenhagen chemistry professor who specializes in nano-chemistry5 -explained on Danish TV2 News: "Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust -powder, which react to create intens heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. "So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel. "You cannot fudge this kind of science. We have found it: unreacted thermite."6 What was the significance of this sophisticated material? Reported Evidence that Nano-thermite is a Military Substance In a German interview in May 2009, Dr. Harrit said: "There are no experts on nano-thermite without connections to the military .. This stuff has only been prepared under military contracts in the USA and probably in bigger allied countries. This is secret military research.It was not prepared in a cave in Afghanistan."7 Chemist Kevin Ryan, another co- author, had reported in an earlier article that explosive nano- thermite, which may be painted onto surfaces, was developed by US government scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories.8 A United States Department of Defense special publication confirms that work on these "energetic materials" has long been "performed in laboratories within all military services."9 According to a June 2009 statement by Britain's prestigious Institute of Nanotechnology,10 the Harrit study "provides indisputable evidence that a highly engineered explosive called nano- thermite was found in the dust of all three buildings that came down on 9/11/2001 in New York city. [sic] This advanced explosive incorporating nanotechnology is only available to sophisticated military labs."11 It thus became known by mid-2009 that explosives of military origin, probably in the United States, had been involved in the World Trade Center collapses. <<snip>> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17624> &aid=17624 *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr or <http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2> http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] ; free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for intellectual entertainment only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences
