-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Tony Gosling
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:51 AM
To: UK 9/11 & 7/7 Truth
Subject: [UK-911-Truth] No ripping yarn, but a Mossad murder to fan more
conflict

This is no ripping yarn, but a murder to fan more conflict
The media may revel in a Mossad hit, yet Britain's response to a plot
that could threaten its own citizens has been craven
Seumas Milne - The Guardian, Thursday 18 February 2010
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/18/dubai-hamas-murder-uk-is
raeli-ambassador

Imagine for a moment what the reaction would be if -Iranian -
intelligence was almost -unversally believed to have -assassinated a
leader of one of the organisations fighting the Tehran government in a
western-friendly state. Then consider how Britain, let alone the US,
might respond if the killers had carried out the -operation -using
forged or stolen passports of -citizens of four European states,
including Britain, with dual Iranian nationality.

You can be sure it would have -triggered a major international storm,
stentorian declarations about the threat of state-sponsored terrorism,
and -perhaps a debate at the UN -security council, with demands for
harsher -sanctions against an increasingly -dangerous Islamic
republic.

Substitute Israel for Iran, and the first part of that scenario is
exactly what happened in Dubai last month. A senior Hamas official,
Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, was murdered in his hotel room in what was widely
assumed from the start to be an operation by the Israeli intelligence
service Mossad. Less than a month later, strong suspicion has turned
to as good as certainty with the revelation that the hit team had used
the passport identities of six Britons with dual nationality and
currently -living in Israel.

But instead of setting off a diplomatic backlash, the British
government sat on its hands for almost a week after it was reportedly
first passed details of the passport abuse. And while the Foreign
Office finally summoned the Israeli ambassador to "share information",
rather than protest, Gordon Brown could -yesterday only promise a
"full investigation".

In parallel with this languid official response, most of the British
media has treated the assassination more as a ripping spy yarn than a
bloody scandal which has put British citizens at greater risk by
association with Mossad death squads. It was an "audacious hit", the
Daily Mail enthused, straight out of a "Frederick Forsyth page-
turner", while the Times revelled in an attack that resembled nothing
so much as a "well-plotted -murder mystery".

Running throughout all this is a breathless awe at Mossad's reputation
for ruthless brilliance in seeking out and destroying Israel's
enemies. In reality, the Dubai operation was badly bungled, as the
Israeli press has already started to acknowledge. Despite having the
relatively easy target of an unarmed man in a luxury hotel in a non-
hostile Gulf state, Mossad managed to get its agents repeatedly caught
on CCTV and effectively exposed Israel's responsibility through the
hamfisted passport scam.

Dubai follows a long history of -Mossad bungles, from its accidental
1970s killing of a Moroccan waiter in Norway, mistaken for a
Palestinian Black September leader, through its failed assassination
attempt against the Hamas leader Khalid Mish'al in Jordan in 1997,
when agents had to take refuge in Israel's embassy and the US forced
Israel to produce the antidote for the nerve toxin used in the attack.

In that case, the would-be assassins were carrying the Canadian
passports of Israeli citizens, apparently with their knowledge. But
while Mossad has used British documents in other attacks, it has
naturally steered clear of faking the passports of its US sponsor. So
at the same time as Israel is demanding the British government change
the law without delay to prevent the arrest of visiting Israeli
leaders on war crimes charges, what is Britain planning to do over the
abuse of its citizens' identity to carry out state-directed murder?

Very little, it seems. Part of the -explanation has to be that Britain
and the US have of course been carrying out their own assassination
campaigns, in violation of the laws of war, in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In his new book on secret SAS operations in occupied Iraq, Mark Urban
estimates that 350 to 400 were killed in covert British attacks. The
Joint Special Operations Command run by General Stanley McChrystal,
now US commander in Afghanistan, was -responsible for perhaps 3,000
deaths. In Pakistan, US drone assassination attacks are now routinely
carried out against Taliban and al-Qaida targets, real or imagined.

And since launching its war on terror, the US has also adopted
Israel's practice, stretching back decades, of carrying out killings
far from the theatre of war. First, Israel's attacks were targeted
against PLO leaders; more recently against the -Islamists. But since
the fiasco of the Mish'al plot, its assassinations have mostly been
confined to the West Bank and Gaza Strip, where Israel made a
determined attempt over the past -decade to decapitate Hamas of its
entire leadership.

Now that focus has again widened. Under the direction of Mossad
director Meir Dagan, Israel is running a region-wide underground war
against the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas - which have both
maintained an effective ceasefire for more than a year - and their
Syrian and Iranian backers. Since the -killing of -veteran Hezbollah
leader Imad -Mughniyeh in Damascus in 2008, Israeli-hallmarked
assassinations have -multiplied in Lebanon, Syria and Iran.

But coldblooded -killing isn't only a morally -repugnant crime. The
lesson of -colonial -history is that -decapitation -campaigns against -
national -resistance movements don't work. In the short term they can
disrupt and demoralise, but if the -movement is socially rooted, other
-leaders or even organisations will take their place. That was
Israel's -experience when it killed the Hezbollah leader -Abbas al-
Musawi and his family in the early 1990s, only for him to be succeeded
by the more effective and -charismatic Hassan Nasrallah.

Such campaigns also tend to spread the war. Unlike the historic PLO -
factions, Hamas has always confined its armed attacks to Israel and
the Palestinian territories. Writing in the Guardian in 2007, Mish'al
confirmed the "principle that the resistance should only be fought in
Palestine". But in the aftermath of the Dubai assassination, Hamas
leaders have started to hint strongly that policy could now change,
and that they could respond to Israel's attacks in "the -international
arena".

If so, it would give an added dimension to the assessment by Ben
Caspit in the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv yesterday that the Dubai
killing had been a "tactical operational success, but a strategic
failure". So far the response of British ministers to Mossad's
provocation has been craven. Unless that changes fast, they can only
increase the risk of being drawn further into a conflict ready to
erupt again at any time.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/18/dubai-hamas-murder-uk-is
raeli-ambassador

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "UK 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Network" group.
Associated with the 9/11 Forum  http://www.911forum.org.uk/

Good news sources
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13410

 
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet
Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth!
(sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr
or  http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2  ; You
can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending  an email to
[email protected] ; free book download:
http://www.lulu.com/content/165077  *** Revealing the hidden Truth For
Educational & Further Research Purposes only. ***  NOTICE: Due to
Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have
read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without
any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor
protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is
reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the
Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer
Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire &
are all intended for intellectual entertainment only. To be removed from the
weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"total_truth_sciences" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences

Reply via email to