On 25 March 2014 19:50, Simon Déziel <1039...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Dimitri, any chance to see this implemented in Trusty? >
So I took a stab at implementing this. To figure out whether or not a remount is required, I had to start parsing all options specified in the right order, which turned out to be non-trivial given that many options are boolean singletons (e.g. ro/rw) thus I quite trivially end up remounting things way too many times then needed. However coming to think about it again, I wonder if a simple "if already mounted and the mounts are specified in /etc/fstab assume a remount is required" should suffice all cases. I'll try again to implement that. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039887 Title: fstab does not honor /proc mount options Status in “mountall” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Passing mount options (here: "hidepid=2") for /proc via /etc/fstab does not seem to work: $ grep /proc /etc/fstab /etc/mtab /proc/mounts /etc/fstab:proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid,hidepid=2 0 0 /etc/mtab:proc /proc proc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0 /proc/mounts:proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 Also, /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts are out of sync - are there plans to link /etc/mtab against /proc/mounts? (Note: I'm not particularly in favor of bug 906293, propsing yet another file to the mix). The system is a fully patched Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS (i686) in an Amazon EC2 virtual machine. Workaround: add the following line to /etc/rc.local: mount -o remount,hidepid=2 /proc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1039887/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
