Yes, using just Mir's 59Hz input rate by itself would appear to solve this bug. However looking ahead we need a different solution. Because we'll soon be ready to re-enable Mir's dynamic queue scaling that can provide significantly lower latency. However for touch-driven apps it only works when the input rate is at least that of the display. So we need Mir's input rate raised to 60Hz, or to fix the Qt touch compression and use that instead (non-nested, so only in unity8 but not apps).
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486341 Title: [performance] Touch scrolling is stuttery under Unity8 (but only while you're touching it) Status in QtMir: New Status in qtmir package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in unity8 package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Touch scrolling is stuttery under Unity8 (but only while you're touching it). I noticed that Unity8 is smooth in some parts and stutters in others. Turns out the smooth parts of Unity8 like the indicators pull-down and app switcher are the parts that don't have to run as clients of the nested server. I also noticed that those stuttering clients (like the dash) of the nested server only stutter while you're touching them. They animate smoothly if you fling them lifting your finger off, but stutter while they have to track your finger. Turns out the problem is Qt's built-in input resampling introduced in Qt 5.4 (commit 6dc8f47bb05a8acb3cbcc697e0dc05356a01d4cf). Turning it off in the unity8 process (env QML_NO_TOUCH_COMPRESSION=1) fixes the touch scrolling smoothness problem for clients like unity8-dash. I suspected this would be the case. It's possible the Qt resampling implementation doesn't work when nested. That would be unsurprising, having implemented Mir's input resampling I know that can be a problem. Although Mir's input resampling is designed in such a way that performance is unaffected by nesting. The below test case and also: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-40167 (maybe unrelated) both suggest that the Qt input resampling introduced by Jolla is causing stuttering, particularly when nested in a situation where the incoming touch events are already throttled... Measurements from arale: restart unity8-dash MIR_CLIENT_PERF_REPORT=log tail -f ~/.cache/upstart/unity8-dash.log [1439957791.298680] perf: Scopes: 52.42 FPS, render time 17.90ms, buffer lag 39.37ms (3 buffers) [1439957792.303939] perf: Scopes: 54.72 FPS, render time 17.07ms, buffer lag 37.57ms (3 buffers) [1439957793.316036] perf: Scopes: 55.33 FPS, render time 16.82ms, buffer lag 36.90ms (3 buffers) [1439957794.329848] perf: Scopes: 56.26 FPS, render time 16.21ms, buffer lag 37.69ms (3 buffers) [1439957795.335884] perf: Scopes: 52.68 FPS, render time 18.05ms, buffer lag 38.87ms (3 buffers) [1439957796.343125] perf: Scopes: 51.63 FPS, render time 18.03ms, buffer lag 40.15ms (3 buffers) [1439957797.360229] perf: Scopes: 54.08 FPS, render time 17.41ms, buffer lag 38.04ms (3 buffers) [1439957798.370706] perf: Scopes: 54.45 FPS, render time 17.18ms, buffer lag 37.99ms (3 buffers) [1439957799.401308] perf: Scopes: 53.39 FPS, render time 17.79ms, buffer lag 37.43ms (3 buffers) restart unity8 QML_NO_TOUCH_COMPRESSION=1 restart unity8-dash MIR_CLIENT_PERF_REPORT=log tail -f ~/.cache/upstart/unity8-dash.log [1439957936.543370] perf: Scopes: 59.64 FPS, render time 15.52ms, buffer lag 34.48ms (3 buffers) [1439957937.543547] perf: Scopes: 59.00 FPS, render time 16.36ms, buffer lag 34.26ms (3 buffers) [1439957938.571699] perf: Scopes: 59.33 FPS, render time 16.26ms, buffer lag 34.22ms (3 buffers) [1439957939.572860] perf: Scopes: 59.94 FPS, render time 15.76ms, buffer lag 34.32ms (3 buffers) [1439957940.581339] perf: Scopes: 62.50 FPS, render time 14.68ms, buffer lag 33.75ms (3 buffers) [1439957941.594696] perf: Scopes: 59.23 FPS, render time 14.81ms, buffer lag 35.83ms (3 buffers) [1439957942.597224] perf: Scopes: 61.87 FPS, render time 14.64ms, buffer lag 33.96ms (3 buffers) [1439957943.612315] perf: Scopes: 61.08 FPS, render time 14.59ms, buffer lag 34.39ms (3 buffers) [1439957944.625835] perf: Scopes: 60.21 FPS, render time 15.79ms, buffer lag 34.28ms (3 buffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qtmir/+bug/1486341/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
