In case it wasn't clear, my patch is supposed to be for the debian/ntpdate.if-up file. Also, I think the priority of this bug should be higher, it was assigned 'low' when there was no clear problem caused by the race. Systems booting with uncorrectable clock skew can be a serious problem.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125726 Title: boot-time race between /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate and "/etc/init.d/ntp start" Status in ntp package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We're seeing a race between if-up.d/ntpdate and the ntp startup script. 1) if-up.d/ntpdate starts. 2) if-up.d/ntpdate acquires the lock "/var/lock/ntpdate-ifup". 3) if-up.d/ntpdate stops the ntp service [which isn't running anyway]. 4) if-up.d/ntpdate starts running ntpdate, which bids UDP *.ntp 5) /etc/init.d/rc 2 executes "/etc/rc2.d/S20ntp start" 6) /etc/init.d/ntp acquires the lock "/var/lock/ntpdate". 7) /etc/init.d/ntp starts the ntp daemon. 8) The ntp daemon logs an error, complaining that it cannot bind UDP *.ntp. 9) if-up.d/ntpdate now starts the ntp service. The result is a weird churn, though ntpd does end up running at the end. Should these not be using the same lock file? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1125726/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
