Seth, I can make the debdiffs for all the releases if I can find patches which I can apply. However I'm not sure that I really know enough to actually test if the vulnerability is still exploitable with the patched version. So I don't think that I would be able to test them. Would it still be worth me trying to make the debdiffs and uploading them?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openjpeg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630702 Title: CVE-2016-8332 allows an out-of-bound heap write to occur resulting in heap corruption and arbitrary code execution Status in openjpeg package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in openjpeg2 package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: A security vulnerability was recently disclosed in openjpeg and assigned the CVE number of CVE-2016-8332. The vulnerability is described here (http://www.zdnet.com/article /openjpeg-zero-day-flaw-leads-to-remote-code-execution/): " Cisco Talos researchers have uncovered a severe zero-day flaw in the OpenJPEG JPEG 2000 codec which could lead to remote code execution on compromised systems. On Friday, researchers from Cisco revealed the existence of the zero- day flaw in the JPEG 2000 image file format parser implemented in OpenJPEG library. The out-of-bounds vulnerability, assigned as CVE-2016-8332, could allow an out-of-bound heap write to occur resulting in heap corruption and arbitrary code execution. OpenJPEG is an open-source JPEG 2000 codec. Written in C, the software was created to promote JPEG 2000, an image compression standard which is in popular use and is often used for tasks including embedding images within PDF documents through software including Poppler, MuPDF and Pdfium. The bug, assigned a CVSS score of 7.5, was caused by errors in parsing mcc records in the jpeg2000 file, resulting in "an erroneous read and write of adjacent heap area memory." If manipulated, these errors can lead to heap metadata process memory corruption. In a security advisory, the team said the security vulnerability can be exploited by attackers if victims open specifically crafted, malicious JPEG 2000 images. For example, if this content was within a phishing email or hosted on legitimate services such as Google Drive or Dropbox, once downloaded to their system, the path is created for attackers to execute code remotely. The vulnerability was discovered by Aleksander Nikolic from the Cisco Talos security team in OpenJpeg openjp2 version 2.1.1. Cisco Talos disclosed the vulnerability to affected vendors on 26 July, granting them time to prepare patches to fix the problem before public release. " I am filing this report as a fix for the issue doesn't seem to have yet been backported in and given the importance of the issue and the ease in exploiting it, it would be good if this is done soon. This is the fix on GitHub: https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/pull/820/files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/1630702/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
