I will evaluate/test the "debian/control" fields possible scenarios this
week, and will update the LP with the outcome.

rbasak, if you have any ideas/suggestion/piece of advise/... I'm all
ears.

Eric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176046

Title:
  isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in isc-dhcp source package in Trusty:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  In trusty, there is only 1 version of dhclient, including #define NSUPDATE, 
which introduce DDNS functionnality.
  The DDNS functionnality, generate 2 random extra ports between 1024-65535.

  Impact reported by users :

  "One impact of these random ports is that security hardening becomes more 
difficult. The purpose of these random ports and security implications are 
unknown."
  "We have software that was using one of the lower udp ports but it happened 
to collide with dhclient which seems to allocate 2 random ports."

  There is a randomization mechanism in libdns that prevent dhclient to take 
the sysctl values into account (net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range & 
net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports) to workaround this, and after discussion 
isc-dhcp upstream doesn't want to rely on kernel for randomization.
   
  There is no realtime configuration to disable the feature or workaround this. 
The only possible way is at compile time.

  I also talk with upstream maintainers, and there is no way they will
  accept to reduce the range (1024-65535) for security reason. Reducing
  the port range may facilitate the spoofing.

  Xenial has separated dhclient in two packages :

  isc-dhcp-client pkg : dhclient with DDNS functionality disabled (no random 
extra ports)
  isc-dhcp-client-ddns : dhclient with DDNS functionality enabled (with random 
extra ports)

  The goal here is to reproduce the same situation in Trusty, for this
  bug to be less painful for at least users that doesn't require DDNS
  functionnality.

  [Test Case]

  Run a Trusty image with following package :
  isc-dhcp-client
  isc-dhcp-common

  ```
  dhclient 1110 root 6u IPv4 11535 0t0 UDP *:bootpc
  dhclient 1110 root 20u IPv4 11516 0t0 UDP *:64589 # <----------- extra random 
port
  dhclient 1110 root 21u IPv6 11517 0t0 UDP *:7749  # <----------- extra random 
port
  ```

  
  [Regression Potential] 

  * none expected

  I did the split such that users will automatically get isc-dhcp-client-ddns 
installed but users bothered by this bug then will have the option to switch to 
the one without it by uninstalling (isc-dhcp-client-ddns), 
  so existing Trusty users can continue to use this DDNS functionality after 
the SRU without any necessary intervention.

  With  isc-dhcp-client-ddns :
  dhclient 1110 root 6u IPv4 11535 0t0 UDP *:bootpc
  dhclient 1110 root 20u IPv4 11516 0t0 UDP *:64589 # <----------- extra random 
port
  dhclient 1110 root 21u IPv6 11517 0t0 UDP *:7749  # <----------- extra random 
port

  Without isc-dhcp-client-ddns :
  dhclient 1110 root 6u IPv4 11535 0t0 UDP *:bootpc

  Note that this is how Xenial does it.

  [Other Info]
   
   * See : 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1176046/comments/19 to 
look at my discussion with rbasak on if that approach would be acceptable for 
SRU.

  [Original Description]

  Ubuntu 13.04 Server 64-bit.  Fresh install.  Only one network adapter.

  dhclient process is listening on two randomly chosen udp ports in
  addition to the usual port 68.  This appears to be a bug in the
  discovery code for probing information on interfaces in the system.

  Initial research of the code also suggested omapi, but adding omapi
  port 9999 to /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf only opened a forth port with the
  two random udp ports still enabled.

  Version of included distro dhclient was 4.2.4.  I also tested with the
  latest isc-dhclient-4.2.5-P1 and got the same results.

  Debian has the same bug:
  http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=95273&p=495605#p495605

  One impact of these random ports is that security hardening becomes
  more difficult.  The purpose of these random ports and security
  implications are unknown.

  Example netstat -lnp  output:

  udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:21117           0.0.0.0:*                         
  2659/dhclient
  udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:68              0.0.0.0:*                         
  2659/dhclient
  udp6       0      0 :::45664                :::*                              
  2659/dhclient

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1176046/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to