I have also tried to let the systemd unit file for this service WantedBy the umount.target. According to the systemd documentation that should make it run before the filesystems are unmounted, but apparently that doesn't work. systemctl list-dependencies still shows that the unattended-upgrade.service reverse depends on the shutdown.target.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600 Title: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The systemd unit file unattended-upgrades.service is used to stop a running unattended-upgrade process during shutdown. This unit file is running together with all filesystem unmount services. The unattended-upgrades service checks if the lockfile for unattended-upgrade (in /var/run) exists, and if it does, there is an unattended-upgrade in progress and the service will wait until it finishes (and therefore automatically wait at shutdown). However, if /var is a separate filesystem, it will get unmounted even though /var/run is a tmpfs that's still mounted on top of the /var/run directory in the /var filesystem. The unattended-upgrade script will fail to find lockfile, sleeps for 5 seconds, and tries to check the lockfile again. After 10 minutes (the default timeout), it will finally exit and the system will continue shutdown. The problem is the error handling in /usr/share/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrade-shutdown where it tries to lock itself: while True: res = apt_pkg.get_lock(options.lock_file) logging.debug("get_lock returned %i" % res) # exit here if there is no lock if res > 0: logging.debug("lock not taken") break lock_was_taken = True The function apt_pkg.get_lock() either returns a file descriptor, or -1 on an error. File descriptors are just C file descriptors, so they are always positive integers. The code should check the result to be negative, not positive. I have attached a patch to reverse the logic. Additional information: 1) Description: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS Release: 16.04 2) unattended-upgrades: Installed: 0.90ubuntu0.3 Candidate: 0.90ubuntu0.3 Version table: *** 0.90ubuntu0.3 500 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.90 500 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main i386 Packages 3) Fast reboot 4) Very slow reboot (after a 10 minutes timeout) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1654600/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
