Launchpad has imported 14 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=377241.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-11-12T08:18:49+00:00 Tom wrote: Description of problem: The libelf.h header now uses off64_t instead of off_t in various places, but it does nothing to ensure that such a type is defined leading to failed compilation of any code which uses libelf.h without defining _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): elfutils-libelf-devel-0.130-3.fc8.x86_64 How reproducible: Happens every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try and compile a C source file containing #include <libelf.h> Actual results: Compile fails. Expected results: Compile works. Additional info: Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-11-12T08:32:55+00:00 Roland wrote: Note that in prior versions, programs built without -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on 32-bit machines were buggy if they used the Elf_Data type directly. So if you want to work correctly with a variety of elfutils-devel versions, using that setting is the best plan. I will replace off64_t with loff_t in the header for the next version. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-12-19T03:10:15+00:00 Roland wrote: *** Bug 426100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-01-24T21:48:54+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.132-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update elfutils' Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-01-24T21:53:47+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.132-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update elfutils' Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-03-01T21:48:26+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.133-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-21T19:48:51+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-21T19:51:25+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-21T19:52:55+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-05-29T02:39:43+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update elfutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-4457 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-30T20:08:25+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-30T20:11:37+00:00 Fedora wrote: elfutils-0.135-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-26T08:20:28+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-26T08:45:31+00:00 Tom wrote: This is fixed, so can be closed as such rather than as WONTFIX. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/comments/15 ** Changed in: elfutils (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to elfutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201078 Title: libelf.h can't be included Status in elfutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in elfutils package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: libelf-dev Hi! I'm using Ubuntu hardy, with the us repositories, and the libelf-dev package has a little bug in the current version (0.131-3) that (as far as I've seen) is resolved in the 0.132 version. I'm including the libelf.h file into one of my programs, and this is the output: In file included from /usr/include/gelf.h:53, from lala.c:7: /usr/include/libelf.h:98: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘off64_t’ /usr/include/libelf.h:160: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘off64_t’ /usr/include/libelf.h:201: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘elf_update’ /usr/include/libelf.h:207: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘elf_getbase’ /usr/include/libelf.h:305: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘off64_t’ /usr/include/libelf.h:317: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘elf_getaroff’ make: *** [lala] Error 1 I've seen that the off64_t is not recognized since the compiler doesn't define some macros. Anyways, in a FC8 forum they say that the problem is resolved in the 0.132 version of the corresponding package (elfutils in fedora). This can be seen here: http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2008-01/msg04001.html My distro info is: DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu hardy (development branch)" That's all. Hope this can be solved :D Bye! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/201078/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
