Launchpad has imported 15 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649365.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-03T16:04:12+00:00 Michel wrote: Description of problem: There is a regression in ntp in the latest version; communication with certain other time servers is really slow and would then be dropped before completion. See logs of the ntpdate -d with both p1 and p2 versions below. This affects Debian testing and Gentoo as well. Debian report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599793 Gentoo report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329571 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ntp-4.2.6p2-7.fc14 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ntpdate -d 131.188.65.129 (unfortunately not available from outside) Actual results: Looking for host 131.188.65.129 and service ntp host found : 131.188.65.129 transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) 131.188.65.129: Server dropped: no data server 131.188.65.129, port 123 stratum 2, precision -24, leap 00, trust 000 refid [131.188.65.129], delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 transmitted 4, in filter 4 reference time: d07bfebd.f851ee30 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:31:09.970 originate timestamp: d07bff47.c624df50 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:33:27.774 transmit timestamp: d07bff3d.a9463163 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:33:17.661 filter delay: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 offset 0.000000 3 Nov 16:33:19 ntpdate[3893]: no server suitable for synchronization found Expected results: Looking for host 131.188.65.129 and service ntp host found : 131.188.65.129 transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) receive(131.188.65.129) transmit(131.188.65.129) server 131.188.65.129, port 123 stratum 2, precision -24, leap 00, trust 000 refid [131.188.65.129], delay 0.02696, dispersion 0.00131 transmitted 4, in filter 4 reference time: d07c02bd.f851ee30 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:48:13.970 originate timestamp: d07c02ea.991688d0 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:48:58.598 transmit timestamp: d07c02e0.84b5aed6 Wed, Nov 3 2010 16:48:48.518 filter delay: 0.02869 0.02727 0.02696 0.02783 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: 10.07619 10.07781 10.07629 10.07849 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.02696, dispersion 0.00131 offset 10.076294 3 Nov 16:48:48 ntpdate[4149]: step time server 131.188.65.129 offset 10.076294 sec Additional info: Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-04T14:49:24+00:00 Miroslav wrote: Can you please repeat the test with ntpdate -dddd and attach also "tcpdump -v port 123" output? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-05T16:27:52+00:00 Michel wrote: Created attachment 458163 working ntp -dddd log Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-05T16:28:26+00:00 Michel wrote: Created attachment 458164 working ntp tcpdump output Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-05T16:28:44+00:00 Michel wrote: Created attachment 458165 broken ntp -dddd log Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-05T16:29:03+00:00 Michel wrote: Created attachment 458166 broken ntp tcpdump output Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-05T16:29:32+00:00 Michel wrote: Logs attached Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-08T12:45:42+00:00 Miroslav wrote: The problem seems to be that the server replies with equal receive and transmit timestamps which fails in a newly added check. Upstream bugreport filed here: https://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1709 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-11T11:05:32+00:00 Michel wrote: Wonderful, thanks. Will you be building an update, or are we waiting for the next 4.2.6 release? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-11T11:45:05+00:00 Miroslav wrote: Waiting for 4.2.6p3, hopefully it will be released soon. I'd like to make also backports for some other bugs recently fixed in ntp-dev. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-18T13:04:05+00:00 John wrote: I can confirm this bug occurs with Hewlett Packard's internal NTP server at ntp.hp.net. This is probably not available from outside HP's internal LAN. This is the only NTP server accessible by HP employees (external NTP servers are blocked). This bug is currently blocking our plans to upgrade to Fedora 14. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-25T16:25:44+00:00 Miroslav wrote: I've updated the package to 4.2.6p3-RC10. Upstream said that they are now working only on some build related issues and final release should be here soon. RC10 can now go to updates-testing and if final 4.2.6p3 is released in a week or so, I'll make a quick update. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-25T16:26:45+00:00 Fedora wrote: ntp-4.2.6p3-0.1.rc10.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ntp-4.2.6p3-0.1.rc10.fc14 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-26T01:10:01+00:00 Fedora wrote: ntp-4.2.6p3-0.1.rc10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ntp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ntp-4.2.6p3-0.1.rc10.fc14 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-13T19:59:21+00:00 Fedora wrote: ntp-4.2.6p3-0.1.rc10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/22 ** Changed in: ntp (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: ntp (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551 Title: ntpdate [email protected]: "no server suitable for synchronization found" - works with [email protected] Status in NTP: Unknown Status in ntp package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ntp source package in Natty: Fix Released Status in ntp source package in Oneiric: Fix Released Status in ntp package in Debian: Fix Released Status in ntp package in Fedora: Fix Released Status in Gentoo Linux: Expired Bug description: IMPACT: When attempting to sync to some ntp servers, a failure is consistently produced. FIXED: In oneiric and upstream >4.2.6p3-RC9 or >4.2.7p80 PATCH: debdiff attached. REPRODUCE: On Natty run ntpdate against an NTP server where receive and transmit timestamps are equal (Includes windows server 2003). Test: ntpdate xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Expected failure is: ntpdate[7149]: no server suitable for synchronization found Expected success is (example): ntpdate[13959]: adjust time server 66.36.239.66 offset 0.144635 sec DISCUSSION: Regression potential is considered low. It is a patch cherry picked from upstream, and has been fixed in some other distros since December 2010. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
