Launchpad has imported 13 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682307.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-04T19:59:01+00:00 Christopher wrote: Created attachment 482361 Stack trace of the rpmbuild call that SIGSEGVs during $(fedpkg local) See attached stack trace. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-05T18:09:08+00:00 Christopher wrote: *** Bug 682415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T07:38:03+00:00 Panu wrote: *** Bug 682431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T17:00:28+00:00 John wrote: *** Bug 682398 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T17:02:40+00:00 John wrote: *** Bug 682472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T17:09:45+00:00 John wrote: The two bugs that I have duped are not compilation crashes but are actually instances where the do_lookup_x issue has caused crashes in two other applications. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T21:18:50+00:00 Christopher wrote: *** Bug 682406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-07T14:38:56+00:00 Jaroslav wrote: *** Bug 682759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-08T09:30:30+00:00 Fedora wrote: glibc-2.13.90-6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.13.90-6 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-08T10:11:46+00:00 Panu wrote: *** Bug 683009 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-08T16:13:26+00:00 Miloslav wrote: *** Bug 682566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-13T04:40:36+00:00 Fedora wrote: glibc-2.13.90-6 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-15T22:42:47+00:00 Christopher wrote: *** Bug 683116 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/893605/comments/12 ** Changed in: glibc (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: glibc (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893605 Title: crashes with glibc-2.14/2.15 on dlopen (seen with kvm and gnucash) Status in GLibC: Fix Released Status in eglibc package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in glibc package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: seen with glibc-2.14/glibc-2.15: kvm -cdrom <iso> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7fe7740 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7fe7740 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0xb7fe7eb9 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #2 0xb7a26490 in do_sym (handle=0xb7d86860, name=0xb7c7ff4f "XAllocClassHint", who=<optimized out>, vers=0x0, flags=2) at dl-sym.c:178 #3 0xb7a26927 in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at dl-sym.c:283 #4 0xb778cd67 in dlsym_doit (a=0xbfffeef0) at dlsym.c:51 #5 0xb7feccaf in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #6 0xb778d33a in _dlerror_run (operate=0xb778cd40 <dlsym_doit>, args=0xbfffeef0) at dlerror.c:164 #7 0xb778cde4 in __dlsym (handle=0xb7d86860, name=0xb7c7ff4f "XAllocClassHint") at dlsym.c:71 #8 0xb7c56b5a in SDL_LoadFunction () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #9 0xb7c58511 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #10 0xb7c5a8aa in ?? () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #11 0xb7c61825 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #12 0xb7c5155a in SDL_VideoInit () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #13 0xb7c25c7a in SDL_InitSubSystem () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #14 0xb7c25cfb in SDL_Init () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 #15 0x00202967 in ?? () ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- #16 0x0013cfdc in main () gnucash: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00119740 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (gdb) bt #0 0x00119740 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x00119eb9 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #2 0x00c0a490 in do_sym (handle=0xb7ffd000, name=0x10eeec4 "g_module_check_init", who=<optimized out>, vers=0x0, flags=2) at dl-sym.c:178 #3 0x00c0a927 in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at dl-sym.c:283 #4 0x03195d67 in dlsym_doit (a=0xbfffedc0) at dlsym.c:51 #5 0x0011ecaf in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #6 0x0319633a in _dlerror_run (operate=0x3195d40 <dlsym_doit>, args=0xbfffedc0) at dlerror.c:164 #7 0x03195de4 in __dlsym (handle=0xb7ffd000, name=0x10eeec4 "g_module_check_init") at dlsym.c:71 #8 0x010ee065 in g_module_symbol () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 #9 0x010ee54f in g_module_open () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 #10 0x003ff61e in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnucash/libgnc-module.so.0 #11 0x003ff90b in gnc_module_load () from /usr/lib/gnucash/libgnc-module.so.0 #12 0x0804ca5f in _start () To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/893605/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
