Big ACK from the security team. We would like to see this backported
into bionic at some point and having it in cosmic first would allow us
to identify and fix any issues.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793092

Title:
  [FFe] openssl 1.1.1

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Merge openssl 1.1.1 from debian unstable.

  OpenSSL 1.1.1 is now out, with TLS1.3 support, and is the new upstream
  LTS release.

  Preserving existing delta:
  - Replace duplicate files in the doc directory with symlinks.
  - debian/libssl1.1.postinst:
    + Display a system restart required notification on libssl1.1
      upgrade on servers.
    + Use a different priority for libssl1.1/restart-services depending
      on whether a desktop, or server dist-upgrade is being performed.

  With further changes to diverge from Debian to:
  - Revert "Enable system default config to enforce TLS1.2 as a
    minimum" & "Increase default security level from 1 to 2".
  - Further decrease security level from 1 to 0, for compatibility with
    openssl 1.0.2.

  These mitigate most of the runtime incompatibilities, and ensure
  client<->server compatibility between 1.1.1, 1.1.0, and 1.0.2 series
  and thus one can continue to mix & match xenial/bionic/cosmic
  releases.

  
  Proposed package is in https://launchpad.net/~xnox/+archive/ubuntu/openssl 
with a rebuild of all the reverse dependencies. It demonstrates that openssl 
compiled as above is more compatible and has less issues than debian config, 
and has only a small fallout which is being analyzed right now.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1793092/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to