This works as expected on cosmic.

 $ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
  Installed: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13
  Candidate: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13.1
  Version table:
     2.20.10-0ubuntu13.1 500
        500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu cosmic-proposed/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu cosmic-proposed/main i386 Packages
 *** 2.20.10-0ubuntu13 500
        500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu cosmic/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu cosmic/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[ 11:45AM 10233 ]  [ 
bdmurray@speedy:~/source-trees/ubuntu-archive-tools/upstream ]
 $ ubuntu-bug /snap/bin/juju
Usage: ubuntu-bug [options] [symptom|pid|package|program path|.apport/.crash 
file]

ubuntu-bug: error: /snap/bin/juju is provided by a snap published by
canonical. Contact them via http://jujucharms.com for help.


** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic
** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1760220

Title:
  ubuntu-bug with program path says as a snap does not belong to a
  package

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in apport source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  ubuntu-bug responds with a misleading statement asked to report a bug about 
an executable path which starts with /snap/bin and the response is different 
than if you were to use the snap name e.g. ubuntu-bug juju

  [Test Case]
  1) Run ubuntu-bug /snap/bin/juju
  2) Read "/snap/bin/juju does not belong to a package"

  With the version of apport in -proposed you'll receive a more
  informative message about where you might get help regarding the issue
  you are experiencing.

  [Regression Potential]
  The new code only affects executables that start with '/snap/bin' so the only 
danger is if the newly added code contains an error which would cause a 
traceback.

  Original Report
  ---------------
  apport's ui.py file contains the following code:

   809         # executable?
   810         elif '/' in self.args[0]:
   811             pkg = apport.packaging.get_file_package(self.args[0])
   812             if not pkg:
   813                 optparser.error('%s does not belong to a package.' % 
self.args[0])
   814                 sys.exit(1)
   815             self.args = []
   816             self.options.filebug = True
   817             self.options.package = pkg

  This will not provide any useful information about what to do if the
  'executable' is provided by a snap. Information similar to
  https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/ubuntu/bionic/apport/snap/+merge/342207
  should be provided if the path is from a snap.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1760220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to