Thank you for the detail, if 'gio' also has the issue then it's a lower
level issue and not a nautilus problem, reassigning. That's also
probably an upstream issue and would be worth reporting on
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782535
Title:
cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
I'm mounting folders from my NAS on my computer (Ubuntu 18.04) with
cifs. Copying an 8 GB file...
Upload (local -> mounted)
- Nautilus/Nemo -> 6 MB/s
- rsync -> 50-60 MB/s
Download performance is also strange, but not my biggest concern.
Download (mounted -> local)
- Nautilus/Nemo -> 90 MB/s
- rsync -> 50-60 MB/s
rsync command (upload):
rsync --progress /home/me/file.iso /mnt/cifs_media/
fstab entry:
//nas/media /mnt/cifs_media cifs
vers=3.0,uid=me,gid=me,credentials=/home/me/.smbcredentials,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700
0 0
Any idea, why Nautilus is uploading up to 10 times more slowly than
rsync, although both using the same cifs, os, hardware, network etc.?
PS: Further info for bug report
1) The release of Ubuntu: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
2) The version of the package: Nautilus 3.26.3
3) What you expected to happen: At least same speed as with using rsync
4) What happened instead: See above
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1782535/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
