Add the fix on post #15 to file .bash_profile -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588562
Title: Please add ~/.local/bin to the default $PATH Status in bash package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in bash source package in Xenial: Fix Released Status in bash package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: Starting in Xenial, 'pip install' by default places executables into ~/.local/bin. This is the de-facto standard place to put per-user executables -- for example, Fedora/Redhat puts it on the $PATH by default, and PEP 370 makes it the standard place for unprivileged installs of Python packages to put their scripts. But unfortunately, Ubuntu's does *not* add this directory to $PATH by default, which means that 'pip install' doesn't actually work -- any scripts that are installed are inaccessible, and every user has to manually add this to their PATH. Ubuntu should put ~/.local/bin onto PATH by default. Minor details (discussed with @doko at the PyCon sprints): - this should go at the beginning of PATH rather than the end, in accordance with Debian policy saying that more-local paths go before more-upstream paths. (This is inconsistent with how Fedora/RH do it, but consistent with how Python itself searches for packages.) - this will be added to /etc/skel/profile, so that it won't change any existing user accounts; it will only be applied to user accounts created *after* this change lands - unlike ~/bin (which Debian/Ubuntu have supported for ages), it will be added to PATH unconditionally, even if the directory doesn't exist. This is important to avoid a nasty trap for new users, where the first time they try to install a Python package they have to restart their shell. Since this only applies to new accounts, the directory will always start out nonexistent/empty, so having it in $PATH won't cause any unexpected changes in behavior. - possibly it would make sense to set this in /etc/environment or /etc/skel/.gnomerc or similar, so that it would also apply to non-shell processes (e.g. if the user wants to add a global key-binding to launch a Python program, then generally ~/.profile *doesn't* affect the environment where this command gets executed, and that can frustrate and confuse users if a command works fine from the terminal but not from a keybinding). But we should defer this discussion for the future, because even if this is a good idea, it isn't a good idea in a Xenial stable update. Debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820856 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1588562/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
