Build log with the above two patches applied, unit tests fail.

** Attachment added: 
"buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+attachment/5307181/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz

** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon)

** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657

Title:
  librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal

Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and
  librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built
  fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on
  ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022).

  The upstream commit that addresses this is 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8.
  I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the 
source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests 
consistently fail, on all architectures.

  The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using
  the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably
  update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to