Wow, am I glad I found this thread... I've been spending literally days trying to find out why I didn't get the predictable names. Never thought it would be a bug.
I have to say: whoever works on the predictable naming scheme is doing a very noble job... not having these predictable names is just a nightmare. Can I do something to help? I'd like to see you guys succeed in this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884281 Title: UC20 images do not use predictable interface names on RPi4 Status in snapd: Triaged Status in linux-raspi package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Image tested: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/20/dangerous- beta/pending/ubuntu-core-20-arm64+raspi.img.xz Boot the image and check the naming of the ethernet interfaces. On most devices (amd64, rpi3 etc) systemd predicatable interface naming is applied e.g. enxb827eb7d1eee. However on specifically RPi4 devices traditional naming is used e.g. eth0, eth1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1884281/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : email@example.com Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp