Hello Salim, or anyone else affected, Accepted librsvg into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/2.48.9-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903329 Title: SRU the current 2.48.9 stable update Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in librsvg source package in Focal: Fix Committed Bug description: * Impact That's the current GNOME stable update, which fixes a number of issues, including a regression[1] since librsvg 2.40.x which was shipped in Ubuntu 16.04. The NEWS file[2] summarizes the relevant changes between Ubuntu 20.04's current librsvg 2.48.7 (that version was also introduced by an SRU back in July[3]) and the current version 2.48.9. The complete list of changes is available on GNOME GitLab[4]. * Test case The update is part of GNOME stable updates[5]. Smoke testing by opening SVG images with eog or importing them with gimp can be performed to ensure there are no regressions. * Regression potential This is a bugfix-only stable micro-release, however librsvg is a core component with a number of reverse dependencies. A combination of autopkgtests and manual smoke testing to try and detect SVG rendering issues should be performed. * Notes about this report This is my first SRU request (and at the same time my first launchpad bug report). I'm not really familiar with the whole SRU process which is why I first asked about it on Ubuntu's official discourse forum[6]. Canonical's Sebastien Bacher encouraged me to open this ticket. I've copied over some parts of the last librsvg SRU ticket[3]. I hope this is fine. Thanks for considering this SRU. [1]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/issues/642 [2]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/blob/librsvg-2.48/NEWS [3]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884326 [4]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/compare/2.48.7...2.48.9 [5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME [6]: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/most-straight-forward-way-to-get- librsvg2-microrelease-update-into-focal-updates/19238 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1903329/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
